# Beurer BM67 vs iHealth Track KN-550BT: specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the Beurer BM67 (Beurer) and iHealth Track KN-550BT (iHealth) among blood pressure monitors. iHealth Track KN-550BT is the cheaper of the two at $39.99.

## Side by side

| Spec | Beurer BM67 | iHealth Track KN-550BT |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | $52.39 | $39.99 |
| Brand | Beurer | iHealth |
| Released | 2018 | 2016 |
| Type | upper_arm | upper_arm |
| Cuff range (in) | 8.7–17.3 in | 8.6–18.9 in |
| Memory readings | 30 | 99 |
| User profiles | 4 | 1 |
| Bluetooth app | Yes | Yes |
| Irregular heartbeat detection | Yes | Yes |
| Clinically validated | Yes | Yes |

## Key differences

- Cuff range (in): Beurer BM67 8.7–17.3 in vs iHealth Track KN-550BT 8.6–18.9 in
- Memory readings: Beurer BM67 30 vs iHealth Track KN-550BT 99
- User profiles: Beurer BM67 4 vs iHealth Track KN-550BT 1

## What reviewers say

**iHealth Track KN-550BT** — Thin coverage: only Wirecutter's fetchable text covers this exact model, and it is negative — in hands-on testing the iHealth Track "produced inconsistent readings in our tests," so it missed their picks. TechGearLab's page was unreachable during harvest, and Consumer Reports, Forbes Health, and MedGrade fall outside the genuine-tester whitelist. Treat this single-source verdict cautiously. (1 sourced review.)

## Sources

- Beurer BM67: https://pim.beurer.com/images/attribut/659.69_BM67_2018-02-06_02_IM_BEU-USA.pdf (pim.beurer.com, verified 2026-06-19)
- iHealth Track KN-550BT: https://medgrade.org/reviews/ihealth-track-kn-550bt-review/ (medgrade.org, verified 2026-06-19)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/blood-pressure-monitors/beurer-bm67-vs-ihealth-track-kn-550bt/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, Beurer BM67 ($52.39) vs iHealth Track KN-550BT ($39.99) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/blood-pressure-monitors/beurer-bm67-vs-ihealth-track-kn-550bt/
License: CC BY 4.0.