# Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent vs The North Face Wawona 6 Tent: specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent (Marmot) and The North Face Wawona 6 Tent (The North Face) among camping tents. Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent is the cheaper of the two at $279.

## Side by side

| Spec | Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent | The North Face Wawona 6 Tent |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | $279 | $585 |
| Brand | Marmot | The North Face |
| Capacity persons | 2 | 6 |
| Type | backpacking | car_camping |
| Packaged weight (lb) | 6.19 | 19.44 |
| Floor area (sq ft) | 30.1 | 86.11 |
| Peak height (in) | 42 | 76 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seasons | 3-season | 3-season |
| Rainfly included | Yes | Yes |

## Key differences

- Capacity persons: Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent 2 vs The North Face Wawona 6 Tent 6
- Type: Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent backpacking vs The North Face Wawona 6 Tent car_camping
- Packaged weight (lb): Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent 6.19 vs The North Face Wawona 6 Tent 19.44
- Floor area (sq ft): Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent 30.1 vs The North Face Wawona 6 Tent 86.11
- Peak height (in): Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent 42 vs The North Face Wawona 6 Tent 76

## What reviewers say

**Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent** — Only one whitelisted tester, CleverHiker, published a hands-on field review of this exact model (the standard Tungsten 2, not the ultralight UL2). It rates the tent 4.3/5 as a roomy, durable, easy-pitching budget and car-camping shelter, praising storage, fast color-coded setup, and wind stability, but flags it as too heavy and bulky for real backpacking. All three cited quotes were verified verbatim against the fetched article. (1 sourced review.)

**The North Face Wawona 6 Tent** — One whitelisted tester (Wirecutter) returned a real hands-on review of this exact model, naming it their family upgrade pick. Everyone who tested it loved the cavernous interior (86 sq ft) plus a 44 sq ft vestibule (~130 sq ft combined living space), the near-vertical walls that let tall adults stand upright, and the durable aluminum-pole, dense-polyester build with no workmanship failures over three test trips. It held fast in 30 mph gusts when staked and guyed. Flaws: bulky in smaller campsites, and the footprint is sold separately. (1 sourced review.)

## Sources

- Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent: https://www.rei.com/product/200288/marmot-tungsten-2p-tent-with-footprint (rei.com, verified 2026-06-20)
- The North Face Wawona 6 Tent: https://www.rei.com/product/242726/the-north-face-wawona-6-tent (rei.com, verified 2026-06-20)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/camping-tents/marmot-tungsten-2p-vs-north-face-wawona-6/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent ($279) vs The North Face Wawona 6 Tent ($585) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/camping-tents/marmot-tungsten-2p-vs-north-face-wawona-6/
License: CC BY 4.0.