# Tineco Floor One S9 Artist Steam vs Dreame H15 Pro: specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the Tineco Floor One S9 Artist Steam (Tineco) and Dreame H15 Pro (Dreame) among cordless floor washers.

## Side by side

| Spec | Tineco Floor One S9 Artist Steam | Dreame H15 Pro |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | $949 | not published |
| Brand | Tineco | Dreame |
| Released | — | 2025-01 |
| Suction (Pa) | — | 21000 |
| Runtime minutes | 75 | 60 |
| Clean tank (ml) | — | 780 |
| Dirty tank (ml) | — | 700 |
| Roller type | — | single-roller |
| Self cleaning | Yes | Yes |
| Hot water wash | No | No |
| Steam cleaning | Yes | No |
| Edge cleaning | Yes | Yes |
| Recline angle (°) | 180 | 180 |
| Charge time hours | 3.5 | 4 |
| Weight (kg) | — | 5.8 |

## Key differences

- Runtime minutes: Tineco Floor One S9 Artist Steam 75 vs Dreame H15 Pro 60
- Steam cleaning: Tineco Floor One S9 Artist Steam Yes vs Dreame H15 Pro No
- Charge time hours: Tineco Floor One S9 Artist Steam 3.5 vs Dreame H15 Pro 4

## What reviewers say

**Tineco Floor One S9 Artist Steam** — Only one whitelisted tester, Reviewed (USA Today), hands-on tested this exact model (Tineco Floor One S9 Artist Steam Wet Dry Vacuum Cleaner), naming it best overall steam mop for top-tier suction and steam that lifts dried grime. Single-source consensus; no cross-source comparison possible. (1 sourced review.)

## Sources

- Tineco Floor One S9 Artist Steam: https://us.tineco.com/products/floor-one-s9-artist-steam.html (us.tineco.com, verified 2026-07-11)
- Dreame H15 Pro: https://global.dreametech.com/products/dreame-h15-pro (global.dreametech.com, verified 2026-07-11)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/cordless-floor-washers/tineco-floor-one-s9-artist-steam-vs-dreame-h15-pro/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, Tineco Floor One S9 Artist Steam ($949) vs Dreame H15 Pro (not published) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/cordless-floor-washers/tineco-floor-one-s9-artist-steam-vs-dreame-h15-pro/
License: CC BY 4.0.