# FoodCycler Eco 3 vs Tero Composter: specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the FoodCycler Eco 3 (Vitamix) and Tero Composter (Tero) among electric composters. FoodCycler Eco 3 is the cheaper of the two at $499.

## Side by side

| Spec | FoodCycler Eco 3 | Tero Composter |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | $499 | $595 |
| Brand | Vitamix | Tero |
| Released | — | 2021-09 |
| Capacity liters | 3.5 | 4 |
| Cycle time hours | 4-9 | 6.5-7 (1 hr heat + ~5 hr grind + 0.5-1 hr cool) |
| Noise level (dB) | — | — |
| Power watts | — | — |
| Carbon filter | Yes | Yes |
| Bucket dishwasher safe | Yes | Yes |
| Weight (kg) | 12.9 | — |
| Volume reduction percent | 90 | 85 |
| Dimensions (in) | 11 x 9 x 13 (H x W x D) | 15.8 x 8.5 x 11 |

## Key differences

- Capacity liters: FoodCycler Eco 3 3.5 vs Tero Composter 4
- Cycle time hours: FoodCycler Eco 3 4-9 vs Tero Composter 6.5-7 (1 hr heat + ~5 hr grind + 0.5-1 hr cool)
- Volume reduction percent: FoodCycler Eco 3 90 vs Tero Composter 85
- Dimensions (in): FoodCycler Eco 3 11 x 9 x 13 (H x W x D) vs Tero Composter 15.8 x 8.5 x 11

## Sources

- FoodCycler Eco 3: https://foodcycler.com/products/eco-3 (foodcycler.com, verified 2026-08-01)
- Tero Composter: https://dobbernationloves.com/tech-finance/tero-products-electric-kitchen-composter-review/ (dobbernationloves.com, verified 2026-08-01)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/electric-composters/vitamix-foodcycler-eco-3-vs-tero-composter/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, FoodCycler Eco 3 ($499) vs Tero Composter ($595) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/electric-composters/vitamix-foodcycler-eco-3-vs-tero-composter/
License: CC BY 4.0.