# SURI 2.0 Sustainable Electric Toothbrush vs Colgate hum Smart Electric Toothbrush (Rechargeable): specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the SURI 2.0 Sustainable Electric Toothbrush (SURI) and Colgate hum Smart Electric Toothbrush (Rechargeable) (Colgate) among electric toothbrushes. Colgate hum Smart Electric Toothbrush (Rechargeable) is the cheaper of the two at $69.99.

## Side by side

| Spec | SURI 2.0 Sustainable Electric Toothbrush | Colgate hum Smart Electric Toothbrush (Rechargeable) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | $135 | $69.99 |
| Brand | SURI | Colgate |
| Released | 2025-09 | 2020 |
| Brush action | sonic | sonic |
| Cleaning modes | 2 | 3 |
| Battery days | 28 | 10 |
| Pressure sensor | Yes | No |
| Smart app | No | Yes |
| Smart timer | Yes | Yes |
| Travel case | Yes | Yes |

## Key differences

- Cleaning modes: SURI 2.0 Sustainable Electric Toothbrush 2 vs Colgate hum Smart Electric Toothbrush (Rechargeable) 3
- Battery days: SURI 2.0 Sustainable Electric Toothbrush 28 vs Colgate hum Smart Electric Toothbrush (Rechargeable) 10
- Pressure sensor: SURI 2.0 Sustainable Electric Toothbrush Yes vs Colgate hum Smart Electric Toothbrush (Rechargeable) No
- Smart app: SURI 2.0 Sustainable Electric Toothbrush No vs Colgate hum Smart Electric Toothbrush (Rechargeable) Yes

## What reviewers say

**SURI 2.0 Sustainable Electric Toothbrush** — Only one whitelisted tester, Tom's Guide, hands-on reviewed this exact SURI 2.0 model and named it an Editor's Choice for eco-conscious buyers. The reviewer praises the month-plus battery life (18 days observed on a half charge out of the box), the new pressure sensor, the sustainable aluminium body with plant-based recyclable heads, and the UV travel case and now-stable charging mount, while faulting the lack of included spare heads or mirror mounts. (1 sourced review.)

**Colgate hum Smart Electric Toothbrush (Rechargeable)** — All three sources verified against live pages. Expect a likable app-guided experience but mediocre cleaning: Digital Trends and Engadget both found the guided-brushing app genuinely improves coverage (Engadget's self-test jumped from 49% to 98% coverage), and both liked the lightweight, well-designed body — but Digital Trends called cleaning merely superficial and Reviewed's plaque-reveal dye test left stain the Hum could not remove, with 'poor build quality' and 'short battery life' listed as cons. Rewards praise and affordability each trace to a single source. (3 sourced reviews.)

## Sources

- SURI 2.0 Sustainable Electric Toothbrush: https://www.trysuri.com/en-us/products/suri-2-sonic-toothbrush-uv-c-led-case (trysuri.com, verified 2026-06-15)
- Colgate hum Smart Electric Toothbrush (Rechargeable): https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/colgate-palmolive-launches-hum-by-colgate-the-new-smart-electric-toothbrush-that-guides-users-to-brush-better-and-get-in-sync-with-their-smile-301112736.html (prnewswire.com, verified 2026-06-15)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/electric-toothbrushes/suri-sustainable-2-vs-colgate-hum-smart/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, SURI 2.0 Sustainable Electric Toothbrush ($135) vs Colgate hum Smart Electric Toothbrush (Rechargeable) ($69.99) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/electric-toothbrushes/suri-sustainable-2-vs-colgate-hum-smart/
License: CC BY 4.0.