# Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff vs AXIL TRACKR Electronic Earmuffs: specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff (Walker's Game Ear) and AXIL TRACKR Electronic Earmuffs (AXIL) among electronic shooting earmuffs. Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff is the cheaper of the two at $39.99.

## Side by side

| Spec | Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff | AXIL TRACKR Electronic Earmuffs |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | $39.99 | $59.95 |
| Brand | Walker's Game Ear | AXIL |
| Noise reduction rating (d b) | 23 | 22 |
| Amplification cutoff time (ms) | 20 | 20 |
| Microphone type (directional/omni) | omni (two hi-gain omnidirectional mics) | — |
| Bluetooth (yes/no) | No | No |
| Battery type & runtime | 2x AAA; ~40 hrs at high volume, ~80 hrs at low volume | 2x AAA (included); ~8 hrs |
| Cushion type | low-profile sound-dampening composite ear cups (gel-hybrid replacement pads sold separately) | — |
| Foldable design | Yes | — |
| Weight (oz) | — | — |

## Key differences

- Noise reduction rating (d b): Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff 23 vs AXIL TRACKR Electronic Earmuffs 22
- Battery type & runtime: Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff 2x AAA; ~40 hrs at high volume, ~80 hrs at low volume vs AXIL TRACKR Electronic Earmuffs 2x AAA (included); ~8 hrs

## Sources

- Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff: https://www.walkersgameear.com/razor-slim-electronic-ear-muff/ (walkersgameear.com, verified 2026-08-11)
- AXIL TRACKR Electronic Earmuffs: https://goaxil.com/products/trackr-electronic-earmuffs (goaxil.com, verified 2026-08-11)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/electronic-shooting-earmuffs/walkers-razor-slim-vs-axil-trackr/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff ($39.99) vs AXIL TRACKR Electronic Earmuffs ($59.95) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/electronic-shooting-earmuffs/walkers-razor-slim-vs-axil-trackr/
License: CC BY 4.0.