# JuiceBox 40 vs HQ 200: specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the JuiceBox 40 (Enel X Way) and HQ 200 (Blink) among ev home chargers. JuiceBox 40 is the cheaper of the two at $619.

## Side by side

| Spec | JuiceBox 40 | HQ 200 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | $619 | $749 |
| Brand | Enel X Way | Blink |
| Released | 2022 | 2023 |
| Msrp usd | 619 | 749 |
| Max amps | 40 | 50 |
| Max power (kW) | 9.6 | 12 |
| Connector type | J1772 | J1772 |
| Install type | plug-in NEMA 14-50 | plug-in NEMA 14-50 |
| Cable length (ft) | 25 | 23 |
| Wi-Fi smart | Yes | Yes |
| Energy star | Yes | Yes |
| Nema outlet | NEMA 14-50 | NEMA 14-50 |
| Indoor outdoor rating | NEMA 4 | NEMA 3R |
| Load balancing | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty years | 3 | 1 |

## Key differences

- Msrp usd: JuiceBox 40 619 vs HQ 200 749
- Max amps: JuiceBox 40 40 vs HQ 200 50
- Max power (kW): JuiceBox 40 9.6 vs HQ 200 12
- Cable length (ft): JuiceBox 40 25 vs HQ 200 23
- Indoor outdoor rating: JuiceBox 40 NEMA 4 vs HQ 200 NEMA 3R
- Warranty years: JuiceBox 40 3 vs HQ 200 1

## Sources

- JuiceBox 40: https://evadept.com/p/juicebox-40a-plug-in-ev-charger-jb145040/ (evadept.com, verified 2026-06-23)
- HQ 200: https://electrek.co/2023/01/24/blink-hq-200/ (electrek.co, verified 2026-06-23)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/ev-home-chargers/juicebox-40-vs-blink-hq-200/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, JuiceBox 40 ($619) vs HQ 200 ($749) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/ev-home-chargers/juicebox-40-vs-blink-hq-200/
License: CC BY 4.0.