# Zoom F3 vs Roland R-07: specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the Zoom F3 (Zoom) and Roland R-07 (Roland) among field recorders. Roland R-07 is the cheaper of the two at $229.99.

## Side by side

| Spec | Zoom F3 | Roland R-07 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | $329.99 | $229.99 |
| Brand | Zoom | Roland |
| Released | 2022 | — |
| Xlr inputs | 2 | 0 |
| Max tracks | 2 | 4 |
| Max bit depth bits | 32 | 24 |
| Max sample rate (kHz) | 192 | 96 |
| Thirty two bit float | Yes | No |
| Phantom power | Yes | No |
| Built in mics | No | Yes |
| Storage type | microSD | microSD |
| Display type | mono-LCD | mono-LCD |
| Power source | AA | AA |
| Battery life hrs | 8 | 15 |
| Weight grams | — | — |

## Key differences

- Xlr inputs: Zoom F3 2 vs Roland R-07 0
- Max tracks: Zoom F3 2 vs Roland R-07 4
- Max bit depth bits: Zoom F3 32 vs Roland R-07 24
- Max sample rate (kHz): Zoom F3 192 vs Roland R-07 96
- Thirty two bit float: Zoom F3 Yes vs Roland R-07 No
- Phantom power: Zoom F3 Yes vs Roland R-07 No
- Built in mics: Zoom F3 No vs Roland R-07 Yes
- Battery life hrs: Zoom F3 8 vs Roland R-07 15

## What reviewers say

**Zoom F3** — Only one whitelisted hands-on tester, Sound on Sound (Matt Houghton, Nov 2022), reviewed this exact model. It highly recommends the Zoom F3 as a tiny, low-noise 32-bit two-channel recorder that is exceptionally easy to operate, faulting only its playback navigation. No whitelisted source published lab-measured figures for this model. (1 sourced review.)

## Sources

- Zoom F3: https://zoomcorp.com/en/us/field-recorders/field-recorders/f3/ (zoomcorp.com, verified 2026-07-11)
- Roland R-07: https://www.roland.com/us/products/r-07/specifications/ (roland.com, verified 2026-07-11)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/field-recorders/zoom-f3-vs-roland-r-07/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, Zoom F3 ($329.99) vs Roland R-07 ($229.99) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/field-recorders/zoom-f3-vs-roland-r-07/
License: CC BY 4.0.