# HyperX QuadCast S vs Audio-Technica AT2020USB-X: specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the HyperX QuadCast S (HyperX) and Audio-Technica AT2020USB-X (Audio-Technica) among microphones. Audio-Technica AT2020USB-X is the cheaper of the two at $169.

## Side by side

| Spec | HyperX QuadCast S | Audio-Technica AT2020USB-X |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | $199.99 | $169 |
| Brand | HyperX | Audio-Technica |
| Released | 2020 | 2022 |
| Connectivity | USB | USB-C |
| Polar pattern | cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, stereo | cardioid |
| Type | condenser | condenser |
| Sample rate (kHz) | 48 | 96 |
| Bit depth | 16 | 24 |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Mute button | Yes | Yes |
| Mount | integrated vibration-isolating shock mount; standard 3/8" thread adapter included | included desktop stand; 5/8"-27 thread adapter included |

## Key differences

- Connectivity: HyperX QuadCast S USB vs Audio-Technica AT2020USB-X USB-C
- Polar pattern: HyperX QuadCast S cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, stereo vs Audio-Technica AT2020USB-X cardioid
- Sample rate (kHz): HyperX QuadCast S 48 vs Audio-Technica AT2020USB-X 96
- Bit depth: HyperX QuadCast S 16 vs Audio-Technica AT2020USB-X 24
- Mount: HyperX QuadCast S integrated vibration-isolating shock mount; standard 3/8" thread adapter included vs Audio-Technica AT2020USB-X included desktop stand; 5/8"-27 thread adapter included

## What reviewers say

**HyperX QuadCast S** — Three hands-on reviews - SoundGuys, Tom's Hardware, and Tom's Guide - rate the QuadCast S a clear-sounding, superbly built USB streamer mic with four polar patterns, a built-in shock mount, and standout RGB lighting. All three note it is a near-identical, pricier RGB reskin of the original QuadCast. Only SoundGuys published any lab measurement (a described frequency-response dip near 1 kHz); no source published self-noise or SNR figures. (3 sourced reviews.)

**Audio-Technica AT2020USB-X** — Two whitelisted hands-on reviewers (SoundGuys, TechRadar) covered this exact model; neither published measured numbers. Both praise its clear voice/sound quality, sturdy all-metal build, and silent touch-mute controls, and both fault the missing gain control plus high sensitivity that picks up room noise. Verdict: excellent for treated, quiet spaces, weak in noisy rooms. (2 sourced reviews.)

## Sources

- HyperX QuadCast S: https://hyperx.com/en-us/products/hyperx-quadcast-s-rgb-usb-microphone (hyperx.com, verified 2026-06-15)
- Audio-Technica AT2020USB-X: https://www.newegg.com/p/0UK-000E-009U8 (newegg.com, verified 2026-06-15)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/microphones/hyperx-quadcast-s-vs-audio-technica-at2020usb-x/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, HyperX QuadCast S ($199.99) vs Audio-Technica AT2020USB-X ($169) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/microphones/hyperx-quadcast-s-vs-audio-technica-at2020usb-x/
License: CC BY 4.0.