# Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300: specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Audio-Technica) and Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 (Beyerdynamic) among over ear headphones.

## Side by side

| Spec | Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 | Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | not published | $399 |
| Brand | Audio-Technica | Beyerdynamic |
| Released | 2022-04 | 2024 |
| ANC | No | Yes |
| Driver (mm) | — | — |
| Battery hr | 64 | 50 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| Codecs | SBC, AAC, LDAC | AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3 |
| Wired option | Yes | Yes |
| Weight (g) | 307 | 319 |

## Key differences

- ANC: Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 No vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Yes
- Battery hr: Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 64 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 50
- Bluetooth: Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 5.0 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 5.4
- Codecs: Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 SBC, AAC, LDAC vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3
- Weight (g): Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 307 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 319

## What reviewers say

**Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2** — Three whitelisted outlets recommend the ATH-M50xBT2 as a strong no-ANC pick. Only SoundGuys published measurements: 64 hours 51 minutes of battery at 75dB(SPL) and an Isolation / Attenuation sub-score of 3.4. What Hi-Fi and MusicRadar are listening-based reviews with no published measurements, and both praise the sound, build and value. Note the age spread: What Hi-Fi's review dates from October 2021 and MusicRadar's from August 2023, so only the SoundGuys page has been revised recently. The panel splits on isolation, on comfort, and on how heavy the bass is. (3 sourced reviews.)

**Beyerdynamic Aventho 300** — Two whitelisted testers reviewed the exact Aventho 300: SoundGuys (lab-measured, 6.7/10) and What Hi-Fi (hands-on, 4/5 stars). Both praise the long 50-plus-hour battery, the build and the feature set, and both flag mediocre ANC that trails class leaders like Bose. They diverge on sound: SoundGuys measures over-emphasized bass and harsh treble and gives a poor 2.5/5 MDAQS score, while What Hi-Fi hears a clean, even-handed signature that simply lacks the dynamism of rivals like the Dali IO-8. SoundGuys is far harsher on value and comfort; What Hi-Fi calls them solid performers for the money. No other whitelisted outlet had a fetchable review. (2 sourced reviews.)

## Sources

- Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2: https://www.headphonecheck.com/test/audio-technica-ath-m50xbt2 (headphonecheck.com, verified 2026-06-15)
- Beyerdynamic Aventho 300: https://north-america.beyerdynamic.com/aventho-300.html (north-america.beyerdynamic.com, verified 2026-06-15)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/over-ear-headphones/audio-technica-ath-m50xbt2-vs-beyerdynamic-aventho-300/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (not published) vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 ($399) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/over-ear-headphones/audio-technica-ath-m50xbt2-vs-beyerdynamic-aventho-300/
License: CC BY 4.0.