# Marshall Emberton III vs Beats Pill (2024): specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the Marshall Emberton III (Marshall) and Beats Pill (2024) (Beats (Apple)) among portable speakers. Beats Pill (2024) is the cheaper of the two at $150.

## Side by side

| Spec | Marshall Emberton III | Beats Pill (2024) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | $179.99 | $150 |
| Brand | Marshall | Beats (Apple) |
| Released | 2023 | 2024 |
| Battery hr | 32 | 24 |
| IP rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Drivers | 2×2-inch full-range + 2 passive radiators | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Weight (lb) | 1.48 | 1.5 |
| Stereo pairing | Yes | Yes |
| Aux (in) | No | No |

## Key differences

- Battery hr: Marshall Emberton III 32 vs Beats Pill (2024) 24
- Weight (lb): Marshall Emberton III 1.48 vs Beats Pill (2024) 1.5

## What reviewers say

**Marshall Emberton III** — Two whitelisted outlets (Tom's Guide, TechRadar) hands-on tested the Emberton III over several weeks. Both praise class-leading battery life (30-32 hours vs a ~20-hour category norm), the rugged Marshall-amp styling, and impressively loud, punchy sound for the small size. Both flag the same core limitation: mids get de-emphasized and the sound turns harsh with bass distortion when pushed loud, plus there is no custom EQ (only three fixed presets) and no aux input. (2 sourced reviews.)

## Sources

- Marshall Emberton III: https://www.marshall.com/us/en/product/emberton-iii (marshall.com, verified 2026-06-15)
- Beats Pill (2024): https://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/best-bluetooth-speakers/ (digitaltrends.com, verified 2026-06-15)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/portable-speakers/marshall-emberton-iii-vs-beats-pill-2024/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, Marshall Emberton III ($179.99) vs Beats Pill (2024) ($150) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/portable-speakers/marshall-emberton-iii-vs-beats-pill-2024/
License: CC BY 4.0.