# Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) vs Chinook Trekker Snowshoes (25 in.): specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) (Atlas) and Chinook Trekker Snowshoes (25 in.) (Chinook) among snowshoes.

## Side by side

| Spec | Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) | Chinook Trekker Snowshoes (25 in.) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | not published | $104.95 |
| Brand | Atlas | Chinook |
| Frame length (in) | 26 | 25 |
| Recommended load capacity (lb) | 80-160 (23 in.); 150-220 (26 in.) | 90-130 (22 in.); 130-210 (25 in.); 180-250 (30 in.) |
| Binding type | PackFlat binding (field-serviceable urethane Z-straps with BC utility strap) | Dual freeze-resistant ratchet bindings with quick-release heel straps |
| Traction crampon design | Tempered steel BC crampon plus anodized aluminum traction rails (two-thirds shoe length) | Freely-rotating heavy-duty aluminum toe crampons plus heel crampons |
| Heel lift (bar) | Yes | No |
| Deck frame material | Composite Helium deck with louver design | Aluminum frame, UV-resistant polyethylene decking |
| Weight per pair (lb) | — | 4.3 |
| Terrain rating | mountain | rolling |

## Key differences

- Frame length (in): Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) 26 vs Chinook Trekker Snowshoes (25 in.) 25
- Recommended load capacity (lb): Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) 80-160 (23 in.); 150-220 (26 in.) vs Chinook Trekker Snowshoes (25 in.) 90-130 (22 in.); 130-210 (25 in.); 180-250 (30 in.)
- Binding type: Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) PackFlat binding (field-serviceable urethane Z-straps with BC utility strap) vs Chinook Trekker Snowshoes (25 in.) Dual freeze-resistant ratchet bindings with quick-release heel straps
- Traction crampon design: Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) Tempered steel BC crampon plus anodized aluminum traction rails (two-thirds shoe length) vs Chinook Trekker Snowshoes (25 in.) Freely-rotating heavy-duty aluminum toe crampons plus heel crampons
- Heel lift (bar): Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) Yes vs Chinook Trekker Snowshoes (25 in.) No
- Deck frame material: Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) Composite Helium deck with louver design vs Chinook Trekker Snowshoes (25 in.) Aluminum frame, UV-resistant polyethylene decking
- Terrain rating: Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) mountain vs Chinook Trekker Snowshoes (25 in.) rolling

## Sources

- Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.): https://www.atlassnowshoe.com/en-de/p/helium-bc-unisex-snowshoes-u2001014?color=black (atlassnowshoe.com, verified 2026-08-11)
- Chinook Trekker Snowshoes (25 in.): https://www.hiltonstentcity.com/products/chinook-trekker-snowshoes (hiltonstentcity.com, verified 2026-08-11)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/snowshoes/atlas-helium-bc-vs-chinook-trekker/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) (not published) vs Chinook Trekker Snowshoes (25 in.) ($104.95) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/snowshoes/atlas-helium-bc-vs-chinook-trekker/
License: CC BY 4.0.