# Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes: specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) (Atlas) and Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes (Crescent Moon) among snowshoes.

## Side by side

| Spec | Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) | Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | not published | $149.95 |
| Brand | Atlas | Crescent Moon |
| Frame length (in) | 26 | 24 |
| Recommended load capacity (lb) | 80-160 (23 in.); 150-220 (26 in.) | 100-300 (hardpack/trail); 100-175 (deep powder) |
| Binding type | PackFlat binding (field-serviceable urethane Z-straps with BC utility strap) | Hook-and-loop (military-grade Velcro) binding |
| Traction crampon design | Tempered steel BC crampon plus anodized aluminum traction rails (two-thirds shoe length) | Molded traction lugs on hard-foam sole plus 6 brass ice spikes per shoe |
| Heel lift (bar) | Yes | No |
| Deck frame material | Composite Helium deck with louver design | Dual-density injection-molded EVA foam, frameless (Cloud-tech soft top / hard-foam sole) |
| Weight per pair (lb) | — | 3.5 |
| Terrain rating | mountain | rolling |

## Key differences

- Frame length (in): Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) 26 vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes 24
- Recommended load capacity (lb): Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) 80-160 (23 in.); 150-220 (26 in.) vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes 100-300 (hardpack/trail); 100-175 (deep powder)
- Binding type: Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) PackFlat binding (field-serviceable urethane Z-straps with BC utility strap) vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes Hook-and-loop (military-grade Velcro) binding
- Traction crampon design: Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) Tempered steel BC crampon plus anodized aluminum traction rails (two-thirds shoe length) vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes Molded traction lugs on hard-foam sole plus 6 brass ice spikes per shoe
- Heel lift (bar): Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) Yes vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes No
- Deck frame material: Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) Composite Helium deck with louver design vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes Dual-density injection-molded EVA foam, frameless (Cloud-tech soft top / hard-foam sole)
- Terrain rating: Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) mountain vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes rolling

## Sources

- Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.): https://www.atlassnowshoe.com/en-de/p/helium-bc-unisex-snowshoes-u2001014?color=black (atlassnowshoe.com, verified 2026-08-11)
- Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes: https://crescentmoongear.com/eva-foam-snowshoes/ (crescentmoongear.com, verified 2026-08-11)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/snowshoes/atlas-helium-bc-vs-crescent-moon-eva-foam/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, Atlas Helium-BC Unisex Snowshoes (26 in.) (not published) vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes ($149.95) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/snowshoes/atlas-helium-bc-vs-crescent-moon-eva-foam/
License: CC BY 4.0.