# Tubbs Flex VRT Men's Snowshoes (25 in.) vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes: specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the Tubbs Flex VRT Men's Snowshoes (25 in.) (Tubbs) and Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes (Crescent Moon) among snowshoes.

## Side by side

| Spec | Tubbs Flex VRT Men's Snowshoes (25 in.) | Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | not published | $149.95 |
| Brand | Tubbs | Crescent Moon |
| Frame length (in) | 25 | 24 |
| Recommended load capacity (lb) | 120-200 (25 in.); >190 (29 in.) | 100-300 (hardpack/trail); 100-175 (deep powder) |
| Binding type | DynamicFit 2.0 BOA binding (EVA foam integrated with BOA Fit System) | Hook-and-loop (military-grade Velcro) binding |
| Traction crampon design | Viper 2.0 carbon steel toe crampon plus Traction Rails | Molded traction lugs on hard-foam sole plus 6 brass ice spikes per shoe |
| Heel lift (bar) | Yes | No |
| Deck frame material | Flex Deck composite with Torsion Deck articulation and FLEX Tail | Dual-density injection-molded EVA foam, frameless (Cloud-tech soft top / hard-foam sole) |
| Weight per pair (lb) | — | 3.5 |
| Terrain rating | mountain | rolling |

## Key differences

- Frame length (in): Tubbs Flex VRT Men's Snowshoes (25 in.) 25 vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes 24
- Recommended load capacity (lb): Tubbs Flex VRT Men's Snowshoes (25 in.) 120-200 (25 in.); >190 (29 in.) vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes 100-300 (hardpack/trail); 100-175 (deep powder)
- Binding type: Tubbs Flex VRT Men's Snowshoes (25 in.) DynamicFit 2.0 BOA binding (EVA foam integrated with BOA Fit System) vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes Hook-and-loop (military-grade Velcro) binding
- Traction crampon design: Tubbs Flex VRT Men's Snowshoes (25 in.) Viper 2.0 carbon steel toe crampon plus Traction Rails vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes Molded traction lugs on hard-foam sole plus 6 brass ice spikes per shoe
- Heel lift (bar): Tubbs Flex VRT Men's Snowshoes (25 in.) Yes vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes No
- Deck frame material: Tubbs Flex VRT Men's Snowshoes (25 in.) Flex Deck composite with Torsion Deck articulation and FLEX Tail vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes Dual-density injection-molded EVA foam, frameless (Cloud-tech soft top / hard-foam sole)
- Terrain rating: Tubbs Flex VRT Men's Snowshoes (25 in.) mountain vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes rolling

## Sources

- Tubbs Flex VRT Men's Snowshoes (25 in.): https://www.tubbssnowshoes.com/p/flex-vrt-mens-snowshoes-2026 (tubbssnowshoes.com, verified 2026-08-11)
- Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes: https://crescentmoongear.com/eva-foam-snowshoes/ (crescentmoongear.com, verified 2026-08-11)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/snowshoes/tubbs-flex-vrt-vs-crescent-moon-eva-foam/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, Tubbs Flex VRT Men's Snowshoes (25 in.) (not published) vs Crescent Moon EVA Foam Snowshoes ($149.95) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/snowshoes/tubbs-flex-vrt-vs-crescent-moon-eva-foam/
License: CC BY 4.0.