# Blade 98 (16x19) v9 vs FX 500: specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the Blade 98 (16x19) v9 (Wilson) and FX 500 (Dunlop) among tennis rackets. Blade 98 (16x19) v9 is the cheaper of the two at $249.

## Side by side

| Spec | Blade 98 (16x19) v9 | FX 500 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | $249 | $249.99 |
| Brand | Wilson | Dunlop |
| Released | 2024 | 2025 |
| Head size sqin | 98 | 100 |
| Strung weight (oz) | 11.4 | 11.2 |
| Balance point (mm) | 330 | 330 |
| String pattern | 16x19 | 16x19 |
| Beam width (mm) | 21/21/21 | 23/26/23 |
| Stiffness ra | 62 | 68 |
| Grip size | 4 1/8"-4 1/2" (L1-L4) | 4 1/8"-4 1/2" (L1-L4) |
| Racket length (in) | 27 | 27 |
| Swingweight | 324 | 320 |

## Key differences

- Head size sqin: Blade 98 (16x19) v9 98 vs FX 500 100
- Strung weight (oz): Blade 98 (16x19) v9 11.4 vs FX 500 11.2
- Beam width (mm): Blade 98 (16x19) v9 21/21/21 vs FX 500 23/26/23
- Stiffness ra: Blade 98 (16x19) v9 62 vs FX 500 68
- Swingweight: Blade 98 (16x19) v9 324 vs FX 500 320

## Sources

- Blade 98 (16x19) v9: https://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Wilson_Blade_98_16x19_v9/descpageRCWILSON-WB9816.html (tennis-warehouse.com, verified 2026-08-01)
- FX 500: https://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Dunlop_FX_500/descpageRCDUNLOP-DF500.html (tennis-warehouse.com, verified 2026-08-01)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/tennis-rackets/wilson-blade-98-v9-vs-dunlop-fx-500/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, Blade 98 (16x19) v9 ($249) vs FX 500 ($249.99) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/tennis-rackets/wilson-blade-98-v9-vs-dunlop-fx-500/
License: CC BY 4.0.