# TRED GT Recovery Boards (Pair) vs X-BULL Gen 3.0 Recovery Tracks (Pair): specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the TRED GT Recovery Boards (Pair) (TRED) and X-BULL Gen 3.0 Recovery Tracks (Pair) (X-BULL) among traction boards.

## Side by side

| Spec | TRED GT Recovery Boards (Pair) | X-BULL Gen 3.0 Recovery Tracks (Pair) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | not published | $169.99 |
| Brand | TRED | X-BULL |
| Load capacity (lb) | 8800 | 22046 |
| Material (nylon / tpo) | Custom nylon blend / automotive-grade polypropylene composite | Reinforced, UV-stabilized nylon |
| Length (in) | 42.72 | 41.7 |
| Width (in) | 12.28 | 12.2 |
| Thickness (in) | 2.44 | 2.4 |
| Weight (lb, per pair unless noted) | 12.13 | 11.24 |
| Tread / nub design | Progressive variable tooth profile with patented Sipe-Lock grip technology engineered to engage tire water-evacuation channels; dedicated entry/exit points, TRED-Link nesting capability | Cross-shaped raised teeth designed to bite into tire tread and prevent slip-back |
| Temperature resistance | 0C to 55C (32F to 131F) ambient | -20C to 60C (-4F to 140F) |
| Mounting pin compatibility | Mounting plates sold separately (per customer feedback on the product page); no pin spec published | Not specified |
| Sold as | pair | pair |

## Key differences

- Load capacity (lb): TRED GT Recovery Boards (Pair) 8800 vs X-BULL Gen 3.0 Recovery Tracks (Pair) 22046
- Material (nylon / tpo): TRED GT Recovery Boards (Pair) Custom nylon blend / automotive-grade polypropylene composite vs X-BULL Gen 3.0 Recovery Tracks (Pair) Reinforced, UV-stabilized nylon
- Length (in): TRED GT Recovery Boards (Pair) 42.72 vs X-BULL Gen 3.0 Recovery Tracks (Pair) 41.7
- Width (in): TRED GT Recovery Boards (Pair) 12.28 vs X-BULL Gen 3.0 Recovery Tracks (Pair) 12.2
- Thickness (in): TRED GT Recovery Boards (Pair) 2.44 vs X-BULL Gen 3.0 Recovery Tracks (Pair) 2.4
- Weight (lb, per pair unless noted): TRED GT Recovery Boards (Pair) 12.13 vs X-BULL Gen 3.0 Recovery Tracks (Pair) 11.24
- Tread / nub design: TRED GT Recovery Boards (Pair) Progressive variable tooth profile with patented Sipe-Lock grip technology engineered to engage tire water-evacuation channels; dedicated entry/exit points, TRED-Link nesting capability vs X-BULL Gen 3.0 Recovery Tracks (Pair) Cross-shaped raised teeth designed to bite into tire tread and prevent slip-back
- Temperature resistance: TRED GT Recovery Boards (Pair) 0C to 55C (32F to 131F) ambient vs X-BULL Gen 3.0 Recovery Tracks (Pair) -20C to 60C (-4F to 140F)

## Sources

- TRED GT Recovery Boards (Pair): https://tredoutdoors.com/products/tred-gt (tredoutdoors.com, verified 2026-08-09)
- X-BULL Gen 3.0 Recovery Tracks (Pair): https://xbullauto.com/products/x-bull-recovery-tracks (xbullauto.com, verified 2026-08-09)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/traction-boards/tred-gt-vs-x-bull-recovery-tracks-gen3/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, TRED GT Recovery Boards (Pair) (not published) vs X-BULL Gen 3.0 Recovery Tracks (Pair) ($169.99) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/traction-boards/tred-gt-vs-x-bull-recovery-tracks-gen3/
License: CC BY 4.0.