# LG C5 OLED 65" vs Samsung S95F OLED 65": specs and price compared

A sourced, side-by-side comparison of the LG C5 OLED 65" (LG) and Samsung S95F OLED 65" (Samsung) among tvs. LG C5 OLED 65" is the cheaper of the two at $1399.

## Side by side

| Spec | LG C5 OLED 65" | Samsung S95F OLED 65" |
| --- | --- | --- |
| US price | $1399 | $3299 |
| Brand | LG | Samsung |
| Released | 2025 | 2025 |
| Screen (in) | 65 | 65 |
| Panel type | OLED evo (WRGB) | QD-OLED |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Refresh (Hz) | 144 | 165 |
| HDR formats | Dolby Vision IQ, HDR10, HLG | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG |
| HDMI 2 1 ports | 4 | 4 |
| Smart OS | webOS 25 | Tizen |

## Key differences

- Panel type: LG C5 OLED 65" OLED evo (WRGB) vs Samsung S95F OLED 65" QD-OLED
- Refresh (Hz): LG C5 OLED 65" 144 vs Samsung S95F OLED 65" 165
- HDR formats: LG C5 OLED 65" Dolby Vision IQ, HDR10, HLG vs Samsung S95F OLED 65" HDR10+, HDR10, HLG
- Smart OS: LG C5 OLED 65" webOS 25 vs Samsung S95F OLED 65" Tizen

## What reviewers say

**LG C5 OLED 65"** — Testers rate the LG C5 a top mid-range OLED for picture, gaming and value. TechRadar lab-tested the exact 65-inch model (1,180 nits Filmmaker Mode peak, 99.4% P3, 9.2ms input lag). Tom's Guide called it their favorite TV of 2025 (hands-on, no lab measurements). What Hi-Fi tested the 42-inch (OLED42C5), not the 65-inch. Shared gripes: weak built-in audio, bright-room reflections, and only an incremental upgrade over the C4. (3 sourced reviews.)

**Samsung S95F OLED 65"** — Only one whitelisted tester source survived verification: Reviewed (USA Today), whose three cited sentences were re-confirmed verbatim on the page for the exact Samsung S95F model. No measured values (e.g., peak nits) are reported by this outlet, so the review is treated as observational (tested=false). RTINGS, TechRadar and Tom's Guide were excluded because their pages returned only navigation/truncated content with no retrievable body text or measured values. Reviewed praises QD-OLED brightness and contrast but flags the lack of Dolby Vision, weak built-in speakers, and that the 83-inch size uses a traditional OLED panel rather than QD-OLED. (1 sourced review.)

## Sources

- LG C5 OLED 65": https://www.newegg.com/p/pl?d=LG+OLED+evo+65 (newegg.com, verified 2026-06-15)
- Samsung S95F OLED 65": https://www.samsung.com/us/tvs/oled-tv/65-class-oled-tv-s95f-sku-qn65s95fafxza/ (samsung.com, verified 2026-06-15)

Canonical: https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/tvs/lg-c5-oled-65-vs-samsung-s95f-oled-65/
Cite: Per The Front Desk Review, LG C5 OLED 65" ($1399) vs Samsung S95F OLED 65" ($3299) — sourced spec-by-spec comparison at https://frontdeskreview.com/gear/tvs/lg-c5-oled-65-vs-samsung-s95f-oled-65/
License: CC BY 4.0.