Is Mailtrap or Testi@ cheaper?

Mailtrap has the lower entry price — Mailtrap starts at $0/mo and Testi@ at $0/mo.

Does Mailtrap or Testi@ support HIPAA?

HIPAA support — Mailtrap: —; Testi@: —. Confirm current scope with the vendor.

Mailtrap vs Testi@

A sourced, side-by-side comparison for email testing. Mailtrap has the lower entry price. Every figure links to the public page it was captured from — the vendor's own wherever the vendor publishes the number, otherwise the named public source — with the date we captured it.

Mailtrap has the lower entry price — Mailtrap starts at $0/mo, Testi@ at $0/mo. Free tier: Mailtrap Yes, Testi@ Yes. HIPAA: Mailtrap —, Testi@ —.

As of 2026-09-02 · figures link to their source below

Side by side

Mailtrap

$0/mo entry

Entry price$0/mo (Free)

Free tierYes

HIPAA (BAA)—

SOC 2Yes

GDPRYes

Best forDeveloper teams

Testi@

$0/mo entry

Entry price$0/mo (Free)

Free tierYes

HIPAA (BAA)—

SOC 2—

GDPR—

Best forFreelancers

Sources — Mailtrap: mailtrap.io (verified 2026-09-02) · Testi@: testi.at (verified 2026-09-02)

Key features

Mailtrap: Fake SMTP server that traps emails (never sends to real recipients); HTML/CSS compatibility checker and spam score (SpamAssassin); Multiple isolated sandbox environments per team; API and SMTP access for CI/CD integration

Testi@: Screenshots from ~50 email clients in seconds; Pay-as-you-go access periods (no subscription required); Spam testing included; Chrome extension for quick testing

← All email testing compared · Open data