Is Reply.io or Woodpecker cheaper?

Woodpecker has the lower entry price — Reply.io starts at $49/user/mo and Woodpecker at $29/mo.

Does Reply.io or Woodpecker support HIPAA?

Reply.io's public pages do not say; Woodpecker states no HIPAA support. Confirm current scope with the vendor.

Reply.io vs Woodpecker

A sourced, side-by-side comparison for sales engagement. Woodpecker has the lower entry price. Every figure links to the public page it was captured from — the vendor's own wherever the vendor publishes the number, otherwise the named public source — with the date we captured it.

Woodpecker has the lower entry price — Reply.io starts at $49/user/mo, Woodpecker at $29/mo. Free tier: Reply.io No, Woodpecker No. HIPAA: Reply.io —, Woodpecker No.

As of 2026-11-01 · figures link to their source below STALE

Side by side

Reply.io

$49/user/mo entry

Entry price$49/user/mo (Email Volume)

Free tierNo

HIPAA (BAA)—

SOC 2—

GDPR—

Best forOutbound SDR teams running high-volume multichannel sequences

Woodpecker

$29/mo entry

Entry price$29/mo (LinkedIn)

Free tierNo

HIPAA (BAA)No

SOC 2—

GDPRYes

Best forSmall teams and agencies wanting unlimited seats on fixed monthly plans

Sources — Reply.io: reply.io (verified 2026-09-28) STALE · 2026-09-05 · Woodpecker: woodpecker.co (verified 2026-11-01)

Key features

Reply.io: Multichannel sequences (email, calls, LinkedIn, SMS, WhatsApp); Jason AI autonomous SDR product (separate purchase); Unlimited mailboxes per user on Multichannel plan; White-label agency dashboard; AI-crafted ICP and email finding for autonomous outreach

Woodpecker: Fixed monthly plans for email, LinkedIn or both, with unlimited team members; Unlimited team members on every plan and unlimited email accounts on Email and Multichannel; Inbox rotation and adaptive sending to protect deliverability; Condition-based multi-step campaigns with up to 16 steps and A/B testing (up to 5 variants); MCP server and CLI for developer automation

← All sales engagement compared · Open data