Best 3D Printers · head-to-head

Prusa MK4S vs Anycubic Kobra 3

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Anycubic Kobra 3 is cheaper at $349. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Prusa MK4S or Anycubic Kobra 3?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Anycubic Kobra 3 is the cheaper at $349.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Prusa MK4S Anycubic Kobra 3
US price $999 $349
BrandPrusa ResearchAnycubic
Released20242024-05
Technology FDM FDM
Build volume (mm) 250 x 210 x 220 mm 250 x 250 x 260 mm
Max speed mms 600
Auto leveling Yes Yes
Multicolor No No
Enclosed No No
Max hotend temp c 290 300
Release year 2024 2024

Sources — Prusa MK4S: prusa3d.com (verified 2026-06-27). Anycubic Kobra 3: store.anycubic.com (verified 2026-06-27).

What's the difference between the Prusa MK4S and Anycubic Kobra 3?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (2 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Build volume (mm): Prusa MK4S 250 x 210 x 220 mm vs Anycubic Kobra 3 250 x 250 x 260 mm
  • Max hotend temp c: Prusa MK4S 290 vs Anycubic Kobra 3 300

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Prusa MK4S

Only one whitelisted tester (Tom's Hardware) published a hands-on MK4S review, rating it among the best printers it has ever tested: fast thanks to the Bondtech CHT high-flow nozzle, quiet, and precise, with price as the sole con. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Bondtech CHT high-flow nozzle makes it as fast as/faster than rivals (50% flow increase on Prusament PLA); Quiet enough to share office space, unlike most high-speed printers; Perfect, fully-automatic first layer and precise print quality.

Flagged: Expensive / not a budget machine ($1,099 assembled, $799 DIY kit).

Anycubic Kobra 3

Two whitelisted testers hands-on tested this exact model. Both praise fast speeds, excellent single-filament print quality, the ACE Pro four-color box that doubles as a filament dryer, and quick ~10-20 minute setup. They split on the verdict: TechRadar calls it near the best bed-slinger and scores it 4.5/5, while Tom's Hardware faults heavy filament-purge waste and a half-baked slicer and keeps it off its best-3D-printers list. No PCMag or Wired coverage found. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)

Praised: Fast print speeds; Excellent single-filament print quality; ACE Pro four-color system doubles as a filament dryer.

Flagged: Wasteful filament purge / waste pile during color swaps; Half-baked Anycubic slicer with no purge tuning or Orca support; Multifilament printing is noticeably slow.

← All 3d printers compared · Open data