NutriBullet
NutriBullet Pro 900
$99.99Cheaper
Best Blenders · head-to-head
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. NutriBullet Pro 900 is cheaper at $99.99. Every spec and price links to its source.
NutriBullet
$99.99Cheaper
KitchenAid
$249.99
Released 2019
The NutriBullet Pro 900 wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The NutriBullet Pro 900 is the cheaper at $99.99. The NutriBullet Pro 900 both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | | |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $99.99 | $249.99 |
| Brand | NutriBullet | KitchenAid |
| Released | — | 2019 |
| Motor watts | 900 | 1200 |
| Jar capacity (oz) | 32 | 56 |
| Speed settings | 1 | 5 |
| Preset programs | 0 | 3 |
| Dishwasher safe | Yes | Yes |
| Noise dampening | No | No |
| Warranty years | 1 | 5 |
| Release year | — | 2019 |
Sources — NutriBullet Pro 900: nutribullet.com (verified 2026-06-15). KitchenAid K400 Variable Speed Blender: prnewswire.com (verified 2026-06-15).
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Both whitelisted testers (Tom's Guide, TechRadar) hands-on reviewed this exact model (Nutribullet Pro 900 / 900W). Both rate it highly, with Tom's Guide awarding Editor's Choice and TechRadar 'Recommended', praising fast silky-smooth blending, compact size, low price, and easy dishwasher cleanup. Both flag the small capacity; single-speed/no-pulse operation and the inability to make hot soups or safely blend dry ingredients each draw criticism from one source. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Fast, silky-smooth blending, even on frozen fruit and ice; Compact footprint, easy to store in small kitchens; Excellent value for a low price.
Flagged: Small capacity, not suited to large batches or 4+ people; Thick mixtures stick to the sides and need a mid-blend shake; Only one speed and no pulse setting.
Both whitelisted reviewers tested the K400 hands-on. They agree on the sturdy die-cast metal base, the wide range of color options, and a smooth, glossy result on an emulsified dip (Tom's Guide's hummus, TechRadar's mayo). They diverge sharply on smoothies and value: TechRadar (2021) rated it a strong all-round performer with silky, bit-free smoothies, while Tom's Guide (2025) got a gritty smoothie and judged it overpriced next to a cheaper Ninja. TechRadar separately flagged uneven hazelnut blending. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Sturdy, weighty die-cast metal base that stays stable at full speed; Smooth, glossy result on an emulsified dip — Tom's Guide's hummus and TechRadar's mayo; Wide range of color options to match a KitchenAid kitchen.
Flagged: Control-dial gripes: small preset symbols (TechRadar) and a wobbly, insecure-feeling knob (Tom's Guide); Uneven hazelnut blending — a mix of powder and larger pieces, with residue stuck under the blades; Premium price feels like paying for the brand versus a cheaper, better-performing Ninja.