Best Bone Conduction Headphones · head-to-head

H2O Audio TRI 2 vs Haylou PurFree BC01

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Haylou PurFree BC01 is cheaper at $99.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the H2O Audio TRI 2 or Haylou PurFree BC01?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Haylou PurFree BC01 is the cheaper at $99.99.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec H2O Audio TRI 2 Haylou PurFree BC01
US price $149.99 $99.99
BrandH2O AudioHaylou
Released20242022
Transducer type bone conduction bone conduction
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.2
Battery life hours 8.5 8
Charging time hours 2
IP rating IPX8 IP67
Weight grams 28
Frequency response (Hz)
Onboard storage (GB) 8
Driver size (mm)
Mic type waterproof microphone dual microphone (CVC noise cancellation)
Multi point pairing Yes
Noise cancelling mic Yes

Sources — H2O Audio TRI 2: h2oaudio.com (verified 2026-06-26). Haylou PurFree BC01: haylou.com (verified 2026-06-26).

What's the difference between the H2O Audio TRI 2 and Haylou PurFree BC01?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 12). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Bluetooth version: H2O Audio TRI 2 5.3 vs Haylou PurFree BC01 5.2
  • Battery life hours: H2O Audio TRI 2 8.5 vs Haylou PurFree BC01 8
  • IP rating: H2O Audio TRI 2 IPX8 vs Haylou PurFree BC01 IP67
  • Mic type: H2O Audio TRI 2 waterproof microphone vs Haylou PurFree BC01 dual microphone (CVC noise cancellation)

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

H2O Audio TRI 2

No sourced tester review yet.

Haylou PurFree BC01

Two whitelisted hands-on testers (TechRadar, July 2022; Tom's Guide, June 2023) reviewed the Haylou PurFree BC01. Both rate it excellent value versus Shokz, with balanced, pleasant bone-conduction sound, a comfortable secure ~28g fit, clear calls via dual-mic noise reduction, and solid ~8-hour battery with a 10-minute fast charge. Neither ran lab benchmarks; the only hard figures verified in-text are TechRadar's 60cm charging cable and Tom's Guide's 8-hour battery and 1.5-hour full charge. Tom's Guide flags noticeable sound leakage in quiet spaces, and the two disagree on controls. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)

Praised: Great value for the price versus Shokz; Balanced, pleasant sound for bone conduction; Comfortable, secure, lightweight fit (~28g).

Flagged: Noticeable sound leakage in quiet spaces; Proprietary (non-USB-C) magnetic charging cable; Unintuitive multi-tap control gestures.

← All bone conduction headphones compared · Open data