Best Camping Tents · head-to-head

Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent vs The North Face Wawona 6 Tent

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent is cheaper at $279. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent or The North Face Wawona 6 Tent?

The Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent is the cheaper at $279. The Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent The North Face Wawona 6 Tent
US price $279 MSRP per marmot.com / REI $585
BrandMarmotThe North Face
Released
Capacity persons 2 6
Type backpacking car_camping
Packaged weight (lb) 6.19 19.44
Floor area (sq ft) 30.1 86.11
Peak height (in) 42 76
Doors 2 2
Seasons 3-season 3-season
Rainfly included Yes Yes
Release

Sources — Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent: rei.com (verified 2026-06-20). The North Face Wawona 6 Tent: rei.com (verified 2026-06-20).

What's the difference between the Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent and The North Face Wawona 6 Tent?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Capacity persons: Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent 2 vs The North Face Wawona 6 Tent 6
  • Type: Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent backpacking vs The North Face Wawona 6 Tent car_camping
  • Packaged weight (lb): Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent 6.19 vs The North Face Wawona 6 Tent 19.44
  • Floor area (sq ft): Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent 30.1 vs The North Face Wawona 6 Tent 86.11
  • Peak height (in): Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent 42 vs The North Face Wawona 6 Tent 76

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent

Only one whitelisted tester, CleverHiker, published a hands-on field review of this exact model (the standard Tungsten 2, not the ultralight UL2). It rates the tent 4.3/5 as a roomy, durable, easy-pitching budget and car-camping shelter, praising storage, fast color-coded setup, and wind stability, but flags it as too heavy and bulky for real backpacking. All three cited quotes were verified verbatim against the fetched article. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Roomy, comfortable interior with abundant storage (double-tier pockets, hanging loops, lamp-shade pocket); Fast, foolproof color-coded setup in under five minutes; Durable materials; stays stable in wind when fully staked out with guy lines.

Flagged: Too heavy and bulky for backpacking; best used as a car-camping/frontcountry tent; Tapered floor plan can feel restrictive and the long 21-inch folded poles pack awkwardly.

The North Face Wawona 6 Tent

One whitelisted tester (Wirecutter) returned a real hands-on review of this exact model, naming it their family upgrade pick. Everyone who tested it loved the cavernous interior (86 sq ft) plus a 44 sq ft vestibule (~130 sq ft combined living space), the near-vertical walls that let tall adults stand upright, and the durable aluminum-pole, dense-polyester build with no workmanship failures over three test trips. It held fast in 30 mph gusts when staked and guyed. Flaws: bulky in smaller campsites, and the footprint is sold separately. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Cavernous interior plus a 44 sq ft vestibule for roughly 130 sq ft of combined living space; Near-vertical walls with a full-length brow pole let tall adults (up to 6-foot-3) stand upright without stooping; Sturdy and stable in wind, holding fast in gusts up to 30 mph when staked and guyed.

Flagged: Bulky footprint can be unwieldy in smaller campsites; Groundsheet/footprint sold separately; Attaching the rain fly that forms the vestibule takes extra effort (~15 min with two people).

← All camping tents compared · Open data