Marmot
Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent
$279Cheaper
Best Camping Tents · head-to-head
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent is cheaper at $279. Every spec and price links to its source.
Marmot
$279Cheaper
The North Face
$585
The Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent is the cheaper at $279. The Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | | |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $279 MSRP per marmot.com / REI | $585 |
| Brand | Marmot | The North Face |
| Released | — | — |
| Capacity persons | 2 | 6 |
| Type | backpacking | car_camping |
| Packaged weight (lb) | 6.19 | 19.44 |
| Floor area (sq ft) | 30.1 | 86.11 |
| Peak height (in) | 42 | 76 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seasons | 3-season | 3-season |
| Rainfly included | Yes | Yes |
| Release | — | — |
Sources — Marmot Tungsten 2P Tent: rei.com (verified 2026-06-20). The North Face Wawona 6 Tent: rei.com (verified 2026-06-20).
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Only one whitelisted tester, CleverHiker, published a hands-on field review of this exact model (the standard Tungsten 2, not the ultralight UL2). It rates the tent 4.3/5 as a roomy, durable, easy-pitching budget and car-camping shelter, praising storage, fast color-coded setup, and wind stability, but flags it as too heavy and bulky for real backpacking. All three cited quotes were verified verbatim against the fetched article. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Roomy, comfortable interior with abundant storage (double-tier pockets, hanging loops, lamp-shade pocket); Fast, foolproof color-coded setup in under five minutes; Durable materials; stays stable in wind when fully staked out with guy lines.
Flagged: Too heavy and bulky for backpacking; best used as a car-camping/frontcountry tent; Tapered floor plan can feel restrictive and the long 21-inch folded poles pack awkwardly.
One whitelisted tester (Wirecutter) returned a real hands-on review of this exact model, naming it their family upgrade pick. Everyone who tested it loved the cavernous interior (86 sq ft) plus a 44 sq ft vestibule (~130 sq ft combined living space), the near-vertical walls that let tall adults stand upright, and the durable aluminum-pole, dense-polyester build with no workmanship failures over three test trips. It held fast in 30 mph gusts when staked and guyed. Flaws: bulky in smaller campsites, and the footprint is sold separately. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Cavernous interior plus a 44 sq ft vestibule for roughly 130 sq ft of combined living space; Near-vertical walls with a full-length brow pole let tall adults (up to 6-foot-3) stand upright without stooping; Sturdy and stable in wind, holding fast in gusts up to 30 mph when staked and guyed.
Flagged: Bulky footprint can be unwieldy in smaller campsites; Groundsheet/footprint sold separately; Attaching the rain fly that forms the vestibule takes extra effort (~15 min with two people).