Elgato
Elgato Game Capture 4K X
$249.99Cheaper
Released 2024-02
Best Capture Cards · head-to-head
Elgato Game Capture 4K X vs AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 (GC575)
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Elgato Game Capture 4K X is cheaper at $249.99. Every spec and price links to its source.
AVerMedia
AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 (GC575)
$269.99
Released 2024-01
Which is better: the Elgato Game Capture 4K X or AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 (GC575)?
On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Elgato Game Capture 4K X is the cheaper at $249.99.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Elgato Game Capture 4K X | AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 (GC575) |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $249.99 | $269.99 |
| Brand | Elgato | AVerMedia |
| Released | 2024-02 | 2024-01 |
| Interface | usb | pcie |
| Max passthrough | 4K144 (HDMI 2.1, VRR, HDR10) | 4K144 / 1440p240 / 1080p360 (HDMI 2.1, HDR, VRR) |
| Max capture resolution | 4K (2160p) | 4K (2160p) |
| Max capture framerate | 144 | 60 |
| HDR passthrough | Yes | Yes |
| Vrr support | Yes | Yes |
| Input | hdmi | hdmi |
| Encoding | software | software |
| Release | 2024-02 | 2024-01 |
Sources — Elgato Game Capture 4K X: elgato.com (verified 2026-06-20). AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 (GC575): avermedia.com (verified 2026-06-20).
What's the difference between the Elgato Game Capture 4K X and AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 (GC575)?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (3 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.
- Interface: Elgato Game Capture 4K X usb vs AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 (GC575) pcie
- Max passthrough: Elgato Game Capture 4K X 4K144 (HDMI 2.1, VRR, HDR10) vs AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 (GC575) 4K144 / 1440p240 / 1080p360 (HDMI 2.1, HDR, VRR)
- Max capture framerate: Elgato Game Capture 4K X 144 vs AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 (GC575) 60
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Elgato Game Capture 4K X
Only one whitelisted tester offers hands-on prose on this exact model: a TechRadar senior writer used the Elgato 4K X to play Black Ops 6 on a Meta Quest 3, calling the picture excellent, latency manageable, and setup super-easy. No whitelisted outlet ran a full lab review; dedicated reviews sit on non-whitelisted sites, and Notebookcheck tested the different 4K S. (1 sourced review.)
Praised: Picture looks excellent, even on Quest 3's large virtual screen; Fast, plug-and-play setup via HDMI Link; Latency/refresh manageable; Black Ops 6 ran smoothly at 60Hz with no obvious lag.
Flagged: Pricey.
AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 (GC575)
Only one whitelisted tester (TechPowerUp) hands-on reviewed the GC575. It measured sub-0.5 ms HDMI passthrough latency at 1440p144 and called overall capture performance outstanding, praising lag-free HDMI 2.1 passthrough up to 4K144 with HDR and VRR, but flagged that the PCIe interface adds no capture-resolution gain (no 4K120/144 capture) over the external USB-C model and that ultrawide passthrough is capped at 120 Hz. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Outstanding, artifact-free capture quality with vibrant colors; Lag-free HDMI 2.1 passthrough up to 4K144 with HDR and VRR; Seamless OBS integration.
Flagged: No 4K120 or 4K144 capture despite the extra PCIe bandwidth; Ultrawide (3440x1440) passthrough limited to 120 Hz.