Best Car Speakers · head-to-head

JL Audio C3-650 vs Alpine R2-S65

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Alpine R2-S65 is cheaper at $329.95. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the JL Audio C3-650 or Alpine R2-S65?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Alpine R2-S65 is the cheaper at $329.95.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec JL Audio C3-650 Alpine R2-S65
US price $499.99 $329.95
BrandJL AudioAlpine
Released2022
Speaker type component coaxial
Configuration 2-way 2-way
Size inches 6.5 6.5
Power rms watts 75 100
Power peak watts 300
Sensitivity (dB) 90 88
Impedance ohms 4 4
Frequency response (Hz) 48-25000 65-40000
Mounting depth (in) 2.55
Woofer material mineral-filled polypropylene glass-fiber
Tweeter material silk magnesium
Crossover included Yes No

Sources — JL Audio C3-650: ph.garmin.com (verified 2026-07-13). Alpine R2-S65: alpine-usa.com (verified 2026-07-13).

What's the difference between the JL Audio C3-650 and Alpine R2-S65?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (7 of 12). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Speaker type: JL Audio C3-650 component vs Alpine R2-S65 coaxial
  • Power rms watts: JL Audio C3-650 75 vs Alpine R2-S65 100
  • Sensitivity (dB): JL Audio C3-650 90 vs Alpine R2-S65 88
  • Frequency response (Hz): JL Audio C3-650 48-25000 vs Alpine R2-S65 65-40000
  • Woofer material: JL Audio C3-650 mineral-filled polypropylene vs Alpine R2-S65 glass-fiber
  • Tweeter material: JL Audio C3-650 silk vs Alpine R2-S65 magnesium
  • Crossover included: JL Audio C3-650 true vs Alpine R2-S65 false

← All car speakers compared · Open data