Honda
Honda Accord (2026)
$28395Cheaper
Released 2026
Best Cars · head-to-head
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Honda Accord (2026) is cheaper at $28395. Every spec and price links to its source.
Honda
$28395Cheaper
Released 2026
Nissan
$29490
Released 2026
On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Honda Accord (2026) is the cheaper at $28395.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | | |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $28395 | $29490 |
| Brand | Honda | Nissan |
| Released | 2026 | 2026 |
| Body style | midsize sedan | compact SUV |
| Mpg combined | 32 | 32 |
| Horsepower | 192 | 201 |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Cargo cuft | — | — |
| Powertrain | 1.5L inline-4 turbocharged, automatic CVT | 1.5L inline-3 turbocharged, CVT AV-S8 |
| Release | 2026 | 2026 |
Sources — Honda Accord (2026): fueleconomy.gov (verified 2026-06-15). Nissan Rogue (2026): fueleconomy.gov (verified 2026-06-15).
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (3 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Two whitelisted testers with hands-on track data — Car and Driver and MotorTrend — rate the 2026 Accord a class leader (C/D's 10Best pick and #1 midsize sedan, MT #2). Both praise its ride, handling and hybrid efficiency; both flag the lack of all-wheel drive and thin gas-trim options. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Composed ride, precise steering and confident handling; Efficient, punchy hybrid powertrain preferred over the gas engine; Spacious interior with a large trunk.
Flagged: No all-wheel drive offered, unlike several rivals; Few standalone options; base gas trims miss hybrid-grade features; Wind and road noise noticeable at highway speed.
Two whitelisted testers reviewed the 2026 Rogue; both praise its comfortable, compliant ride and roomy, well-packaged interior, and both flag a laggy infotainment system. They diverge sharply on overall merit: Car and Driver measured an 8.0-sec 0-60, rates it 7.5/10 and ranks it #16, calling its dynamics 'blah'; MotorTrend scores it 9.4/10 and ranks it #2. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Comfortable, compliant, soft ride; Spacious interior with abundant storage and competitive cargo room; Responsive, efficient turbo three-cylinder powertrain.
Flagged: Laggy / mediocre infotainment system; Intrusive road and tire noise at highway speed; Bland, unengaging driving dynamics.