Best Ceiling Fans · head-to-head

Hunter Aerodyne 52" vs Casablanca Wisp 44"

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Hunter Aerodyne 52" is cheaper at $269.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Hunter Aerodyne 52" or Casablanca Wisp 44"?

The Hunter Aerodyne 52" wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Hunter Aerodyne 52" is the cheaper at $269.99. The Hunter Aerodyne 52" both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Key specs, head to head

The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.

Airflow (CFM)
Hunter Aerodyne 52" 5218
Casablanca Wisp 44" 4542

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Hunter Aerodyne 52" Casablanca Wisp 44"
US price $269.99 $449.99
BrandHunterCasablanca
Released
Blade span inches 52 44
Blade count 5 3
Motor type ac
Airflow (CFM) 5218 4542
Airflow efficiency cfm per watt 71 74
Power consumption watts 48 43
Speed count 4 4
Connectivity wifi rf-remote
Light kit integrated-led integrated-led
Location rating dry dry
Noise level (dB)

Sources — Hunter Aerodyne 52": hunterfan.com (verified 2026-07-11). Casablanca Wisp 44": hunterfan.com (verified 2026-07-11).

What's the difference between the Hunter Aerodyne 52" and Casablanca Wisp 44"?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (6 of 11). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Blade span inches: Hunter Aerodyne 52" 52 vs Casablanca Wisp 44" 44
  • Blade count: Hunter Aerodyne 52" 5 vs Casablanca Wisp 44" 3
  • Airflow (CFM): Hunter Aerodyne 52" 5218 vs Casablanca Wisp 44" 4542
  • Airflow efficiency cfm per watt: Hunter Aerodyne 52" 71 vs Casablanca Wisp 44" 74
  • Power consumption watts: Hunter Aerodyne 52" 48 vs Casablanca Wisp 44" 43
  • Connectivity: Hunter Aerodyne 52" wifi vs Casablanca Wisp 44" rf-remote

← All ceiling fans compared · Open data