Midea
Midea MRC04M3AWW
—
Best Chest Freezers · head-to-head
Midea MRC04M3AWW vs Whirlpool WZF34X16DW
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Midea MRC04M3AWW is cheaper at —. Every spec and price links to its source.
Whirlpool
Whirlpool WZF34X16DW
—
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Midea MRC04M3AWW | Whirlpool WZF34X16DW |
|---|---|---|
| US price | — | — |
| Brand | Midea | Whirlpool |
| Released | — | — |
| Configuration | chest | upright |
| Capacity cubic (ft) | 3.5 | 16 |
| Defrost type | manual | frost-free |
| Energy use kwh yr | — | — |
| Energy star bool | — | No |
| Width inches | — | 30.25 |
| Height inches | 33.46 | 60.25 |
| Depth inches | — | 29.13 |
| Storage basket count | 1 | 3 |
| Garage ready bool | — | — |
| Warranty years | 1 | 1 |
Sources — Midea MRC04M3AWW: midea.com (verified 2026-07-11). Whirlpool WZF34X16DW: whirlpool.com (verified 2026-07-11).
What's the difference between the Midea MRC04M3AWW and Whirlpool WZF34X16DW?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 11). Matching specs are omitted.
- Configuration: Midea MRC04M3AWW chest vs Whirlpool WZF34X16DW upright
- Capacity cubic (ft): Midea MRC04M3AWW 3.5 vs Whirlpool WZF34X16DW 16
- Defrost type: Midea MRC04M3AWW manual vs Whirlpool WZF34X16DW frost-free
- Height inches: Midea MRC04M3AWW 33.46 vs Whirlpool WZF34X16DW 60.25
- Storage basket count: Midea MRC04M3AWW 1 vs Whirlpool WZF34X16DW 3