ASUS
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP
$699
Released 2024-09
Best Computer Monitors · head-to-head
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP vs MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED is cheaper at $649.99. Every spec and price links to its source.
MSI
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED
$649.99Cheaper
Released 2024-06
Which is better: the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP or MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED?
The ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED is the cheaper at $649.99. Get the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP for the stronger spec sheet, the MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED to spend less.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Key specs, head to head
The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $699 | $649.99 |
| Brand | ASUS | MSI |
| Released | 2024-09 | 2024-06 |
| Size (in) | 27 | 27 |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 2560x1440 |
| Panel type | WOLED | QD-OLED |
| Refresh (Hz) | 480 | 360 |
| Response ms | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| HDR | VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 | VESA DisplayHDR 400 |
| Ports | 1x DP 1.4, 2x HDMI 2.1, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 | 1x DP 1.4a, 2x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB-C (DP Alt) |
| Adaptive sync | AMD FreeSync Premium, NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible | AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible |
| Release | 2024-09 | 2024-06 |
Sources — ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP: rog.asus.com (verified 2026-09-21). MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED: newegg.com (verified 2026-06-15).
What's the difference between the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP and MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.
- Panel type: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP WOLED vs MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED QD-OLED
- Refresh (Hz): ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP 480 vs MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED 360
- HDR: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 vs MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED VESA DisplayHDR 400
- Ports: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP 1x DP 1.4, 2x HDMI 2.1, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 vs MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED 1x DP 1.4a, 2x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB-C (DP Alt)
- Adaptive sync: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP AMD FreeSync Premium, NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible vs MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP
One whitelisted tester source (Tom's Hardware, lab-measured, published 2024-09-04) was verified for the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP. All four quotes and all eight measured values were re-confirmed verbatim against the review. Tom's Hardware calls the PG27AQDP the pinnacle of premium gaming monitors, measuring a 400-nit SDR peak, 1,300-nit HDR highlights, 709-nit 25% HDR window, over 97% DCI-P3, and 15ms total input lag at a tested 480Hz QHD. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Class-leading motion clarity and gaming performance at 480Hz QHD; Wide color gamut, over 97% DCI-P3 coverage; Low total input lag (15ms) despite full QHD resolution.
Flagged: SDR peak brightness limited to a measured 400 nits, typical OLED ceiling; Input lag (15ms) does not match the record-setting 11ms of the FHD-mode PG32UCDP.
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED
Across 2 testing outlets, the MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED lands as a standout 27-inch 1440p/360Hz gaming monitor built on Samsung's QD-OLED panel. Both outlets measured essentially identical specs — 0.03ms response time, 360Hz refresh, ~250 nits SDR / ~1000 nits peak HDR brightness, and wide DCI-P3 color coverage (99.3% per DisplayNinja) — and both praise the deep blacks, near-infinite contrast, and instantaneous pixel response with no motion ghosting. Each outlet also raises a distinct concern: XDA found a color-mapping bug clipping P3 colors to the native gamut, while DisplayNinja flags the standard OLED burn-in risk from static bright elements. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Deep, inky blacks / near-infinite contrast typical of QD-OLED; Extremely fast, near-instantaneous pixel response time with no motion ghosting; High 360Hz refresh rate delivers ultra-fluid motion.
Flagged: Color mapping appears broken, clipping P3 colors to the panel's native gamut instead of proper mapping; Risk of permanent image burn-in with static bright content, as with any OLED panel.