Best Computer Monitors · head-to-head

BenQ PD2706UA vs Gigabyte M27Q

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Gigabyte M27Q is cheaper at $349.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the BenQ PD2706UA or Gigabyte M27Q?

The Gigabyte M27Q wins 2 of the 2 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Gigabyte M27Q is the cheaper at $349.99. The Gigabyte M27Q both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Key specs, head to head

The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.

Refresh (Hz)
BenQ PD2706UA 60
Gigabyte M27Q 170

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec BenQ PD2706UA Gigabyte M27Q
US price $499 $349.99
BrandBenQGigabyte
Released2023-042021-03
Size (in) 27 27
Resolution 3840x2160 2560x1440
Panel type IPS IPS
Refresh (Hz) 60 170
Response ms 5 0.5
HDR VESA DisplayHDR 400 VESA DisplayHDR 400
Ports 1x DP 1.4, 2x HDMI 2.0, 1x USB-C (90W PD, DP Alt), 3x USB-A 3.2 1x DP 1.2, 2x HDMI 2.0, 2x USB-A 3.0, 1x USB-C (DP Alt)
Adaptive sync None AMD FreeSync Premium
Release 2023-04 2021-03

Sources — BenQ PD2706UA: benq.com (verified 2026-06-15). Gigabyte M27Q: gigabyte.com (verified 2026-06-15).

What's the difference between the BenQ PD2706UA and Gigabyte M27Q?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Resolution: BenQ PD2706UA 3840x2160 vs Gigabyte M27Q 2560x1440
  • Refresh (Hz): BenQ PD2706UA 60 vs Gigabyte M27Q 170
  • Response ms: BenQ PD2706UA 5 vs Gigabyte M27Q 0.5
  • Ports: BenQ PD2706UA 1x DP 1.4, 2x HDMI 2.0, 1x USB-C (90W PD, DP Alt), 3x USB-A 3.2 vs Gigabyte M27Q 1x DP 1.2, 2x HDMI 2.0, 2x USB-A 3.0, 1x USB-C (DP Alt)
  • Adaptive sync: BenQ PD2706UA None vs Gigabyte M27Q AMD FreeSync Premium

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

BenQ PD2706UA

Two whitelisted testers bench-tested this exact BenQ PD2706UA: Tom's Hardware (7 June 2023) and TechRadar (7 July 2023). Both rate it a near-flawless professional 27-inch 4K display with strong value, praising the included ergonomic C-Clamp arm and the Hotkey Puck. TechRadar measured an average Delta E of 1.12 with 96% P3 / 100% sRGB / 89% Adobe RGB coverage; Tom's Hardware confirmed over 95% DCI-P3 coverage out of the box. Both flag 60Hz-only refresh with no Adaptive-Sync; TechRadar also flags weak built-in speakers. Non-whitelist blogs excluded. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)

Praised: Excellent out-of-box color accuracy and wide gamut coverage for professional creative work; Strong price-to-performance value for a professional-grade display; Premium ergonomic included monitor arm / C-Clamp stand with tidy cable management.

Flagged: 60Hz refresh with no Adaptive-Sync — not suited to fast gaming; Thin-sounding, unimpressive built-in speakers; Backlight/field dimming to boost contrast works only in HDR, not SDR.

Gigabyte M27Q

Only one whitelisted lab review qualified: Tom's Hardware. It rates the M27Q a fast, high-value 170 Hz QHD IPS monitor with measured >400 nits brightness, 1,118.9:1 contrast, and an exceptionally low 22 ms input lag. Downsides: lackluster HDR and Aim Stabilizer ghosting. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Very low input lag (22 ms measured) and fast 170 Hz gaming performance; Strong value for the price; Large color gamut (over 100% DCI-P3) with accurate sRGB mode.

Flagged: Aim Stabilizer blur-reduction introduces significant ghosting; Lackluster HDR with no extra contrast in HDR mode; DCI-P3 red is slightly under-saturated.

← All computer monitors compared · Open data