Best Computer Monitors · head-to-head

LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B vs Gigabyte M27Q

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Gigabyte M27Q is cheaper at $349.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B or Gigabyte M27Q?

The LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B wins 2 of the 2 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Gigabyte M27Q is the cheaper at $349.99. Get the LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B for the stronger spec sheet, the Gigabyte M27Q to spend less.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Key specs, head to head

The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.

Refresh (Hz)
LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B 480
Gigabyte M27Q 170

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B Gigabyte M27Q
US price $999.99 $349.99
BrandLGGigabyte
Released2024-092021-03
Size (in) 27 27
Resolution 2560x1440 2560x1440
Panel type OLED IPS
Refresh (Hz) 480 170
Response ms 0.03 0.5
HDR VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 VESA DisplayHDR 400
Ports 1x DP 2.1, 2x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB-B 3.0 (upstream), 2x USB-A 3.0 1x DP 1.2, 2x HDMI 2.0, 2x USB-A 3.0, 1x USB-C (DP Alt)
Adaptive sync NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro AMD FreeSync Premium
Release 2024-09 2021-03

Sources — LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B: newegg.com (verified 2026-06-15). Gigabyte M27Q: gigabyte.com (verified 2026-06-15).

What's the difference between the LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B and Gigabyte M27Q?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (6 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Panel type: LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B OLED vs Gigabyte M27Q IPS
  • Refresh (Hz): LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B 480 vs Gigabyte M27Q 170
  • Response ms: LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B 0.03 vs Gigabyte M27Q 0.5
  • HDR: LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 vs Gigabyte M27Q VESA DisplayHDR 400
  • Ports: LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B 1x DP 2.1, 2x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB-B 3.0 (upstream), 2x USB-A 3.0 vs Gigabyte M27Q 1x DP 1.2, 2x HDMI 2.0, 2x USB-A 3.0, 1x USB-C (DP Alt)
  • Adaptive sync: LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro vs Gigabyte M27Q AMD FreeSync Premium

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B

Only one whitelisted tester review (PCWorld, tested 2025-02-21) returned verifiable verbatim text and lab measurements for this exact model (27GX790A-B). All three quoted sentences and all four measured values (with units) were re-confirmed verbatim on the page. Candidate reviews from RTINGS, Tom's Hardware and Tom's Guide were excluded because their page bodies returned only navigation/no copyable text. PCWorld praises near-still-image motion clarity at 480Hz and per-pixel zero-nit contrast, but flags a distracting dirty-screen effect and pixelation around small fonts. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Motion clarity nearly as crisp as a still image at 480Hz; Exceptional contrast from per-pixel zero-nit black levels; Accurate out-of-box color (6400K vs 6500K target, gamma 2.2).

Flagged: Distracting dirty-screen effect (DSE) during use; Pixelation visible around small fonts and interface buttons; Modest SDR brightness (~250 nits sustained).

Gigabyte M27Q

Only one whitelisted lab review qualified: Tom's Hardware. It rates the M27Q a fast, high-value 170 Hz QHD IPS monitor with measured >400 nits brightness, 1,118.9:1 contrast, and an exceptionally low 22 ms input lag. Downsides: lackluster HDR and Aim Stabilizer ghosting. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Very low input lag (22 ms measured) and fast 170 Hz gaming performance; Strong value for the price; Large color gamut (over 100% DCI-P3) with accurate sRGB mode.

Flagged: Aim Stabilizer blur-reduction introduces significant ghosting; Lackluster HDR with no extra contrast in HDR mode; DCI-P3 red is slightly under-saturated.

← All computer monitors compared · Open data