Corsair
Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30
$643.99
Released 2023-05
Best Computer RAM · head-to-head
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30 is cheaper at $591.66. Every spec and price links to its source.
Corsair
$643.99
Released 2023-05
ADATA
$591.66Cheaper
On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30 is the cheaper at $591.66.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | | |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $643.99 | $591.66 |
| Brand | Corsair | ADATA |
| Released | 2023-05 | — |
| Type | ddr5 | ddr5 |
| Total capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Kit config | 2x16GB | 2x16GB |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 6000 |
| Cas latency | 30 | 30 |
| Voltage (V) | 1.4 | 1.35 |
| Rgb | No | No |
| Release year | 2023 | — |
Sources — Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30: corsair.com (verified 2026-11-05). ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30: xpg.com (verified 2026-07-10).
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (1 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Only Tom's Hardware's lab review survived verification for this kit, tested in its RGB C30 trim (CMH32GX5M2B6000Z30) — the same silicon and timings as the non-RGB Vengeance DDR5-6000 CL30. It calls the kit an enthusiast-grade, stable, plug-and-play EXPO kit that topped the performance chart on Intel, but flags that it needs 1.4V and is a poor overclocker with almost no headroom above the rated profile. TechPowerUp was dropped because the review text available (intro page only) contained none of its earlier-cited quotes or measured figures. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Stable, plug-and-play out-of-the-box EXPO performance on Ryzen 7000 with no manual tuning; Good design and construction; topped the performance chart on the Intel test system.
Flagged: Requires 1.4V and leaves almost no overclocking headroom above the rated profile (labeled a 'Bad overclocker').
No sourced tester review yet.