Corsair
Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30
$588.99Cheaper
Released 2023-05
Best Computer RAM · head-to-head
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30 is cheaper at $588.99. Every spec and price links to its source.
Corsair
$588.99Cheaper
Released 2023-05
ADATA
$591.66
On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30 is the cheaper at $588.99.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | | |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $588.99 | $591.66 |
| Brand | Corsair | ADATA |
| Released | 2023-05 | — |
| Type | ddr5 | ddr5 |
| Total capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Kit config | 2x16GB | 2x16GB |
| Speed mts | 6000 | 6000 |
| Cas latency | 30 | 30 |
| Voltage (V) | 1.4 | 1.35 |
| Rgb | No | No |
| Release year | 2023 | — |
Sources — Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30: corsair.com (verified 2026-06-19). ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30: xpg.com (verified 2026-07-10).
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (1 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Only Tom's Hardware's lab review survived verification for this kit, tested in its RGB C30 trim (CMH32GX5M2B6000Z30) — the same silicon and timings as the non-RGB Vengeance DDR5-6000 CL30. It calls the kit an enthusiast-grade, stable, plug-and-play EXPO kit that topped the performance chart on Intel, but flags that it needs 1.4V and is a poor overclocker with almost no headroom above the rated profile. TechPowerUp was dropped because the fetched review text (intro page only) contained none of its drafted quotes or measured figures. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Stable, plug-and-play out-of-the-box EXPO performance on Ryzen 7000 with no manual tuning; Good design and construction; topped the performance chart on the Intel test system.
Flagged: Requires 1.4V and leaves almost no overclocking headroom above the rated profile (labeled a 'Bad overclocker').
No sourced tester review yet.