Best Computer RAM · head-to-head

Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30 vs ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30 is cheaper at $588.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30 or ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30 is the cheaper at $588.99.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30 ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30
US price $588.99 $591.66
BrandCorsairADATA
Released2023-05
Type ddr5 ddr5
Total capacity (GB) 32 32
Kit config 2x16GB 2x16GB
Speed mts 6000 6000
Cas latency 30 30
Voltage (V) 1.4 1.35
Rgb No No
Release year 2023

Sources — Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30: corsair.com (verified 2026-06-19). ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30: xpg.com (verified 2026-07-10).

What's the difference between the Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30 and ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (1 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Voltage (V): Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30 1.4 vs ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30 1.35

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000 CL30

Only Tom's Hardware's lab review survived verification for this kit, tested in its RGB C30 trim (CMH32GX5M2B6000Z30) — the same silicon and timings as the non-RGB Vengeance DDR5-6000 CL30. It calls the kit an enthusiast-grade, stable, plug-and-play EXPO kit that topped the performance chart on Intel, but flags that it needs 1.4V and is a poor overclocker with almost no headroom above the rated profile. TechPowerUp was dropped because the fetched review text (intro page only) contained none of its drafted quotes or measured figures. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Stable, plug-and-play out-of-the-box EXPO performance on Ryzen 7000 with no manual tuning; Good design and construction; topped the performance chart on the Intel test system.

Flagged: Requires 1.4V and leaves almost no overclocking headroom above the rated profile (labeled a 'Bad overclocker').

← All computer ram compared · Open data