Best Cycling Power Meters · head-to-head

Garmin Rally RS200 vs 4iiii Precision 3+

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Garmin Rally RS200 is cheaper at $1099.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Garmin Rally RS200 4iiii Precision 3+
US price $1099.99
BrandGarmin4iiii
Released
Mount type pedal crank-arm
Measurement sides dual-sided single-sided
Accuracy pct 1 1
Weight grams 320 9
Battery type CR1/3N CR2032
Battery life hrs 120 800
Connectivity ANT+/BLE ANT+/BLE
Power balance measured Yes No
Cycling dynamics Yes Yes
Waterproof rating IPX7 IPX7
Warranty years 3

Sources — Garmin Rally RS200: garmin.com (verified 2026-07-13). 4iiii Precision 3+: 4iiii.com (verified 2026-07-13).

What's the difference between the Garmin Rally RS200 and 4iiii Precision 3+?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (6 of 11). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Mount type: Garmin Rally RS200 pedal vs 4iiii Precision 3+ crank-arm
  • Measurement sides: Garmin Rally RS200 dual-sided vs 4iiii Precision 3+ single-sided
  • Weight grams: Garmin Rally RS200 320 vs 4iiii Precision 3+ 9
  • Battery type: Garmin Rally RS200 CR1/3N vs 4iiii Precision 3+ CR2032
  • Battery life hrs: Garmin Rally RS200 120 vs 4iiii Precision 3+ 800
  • Power balance measured: Garmin Rally RS200 true vs 4iiii Precision 3+ false

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Garmin Rally RS200

Two whitelisted cycling testers cover the exact RS200 and both rate the system accurate, clean-looking and versatile but pricey. BikeRadar reviewed the RS200 directly (4.5/5); DC Rainmaker bench-tested the RS200 SPD-SL variant against a Tacx NEO 2 and Stages LR (RS200 tracked near-identical to the Stages), and weighed the SPD-SL cleats at 40 g/side. BikeRadar flags the premium price and slightly delayed pickup from a stop; DCR noted the unit failed to compensate for a temperature shift on a cold day, fixable with a manual zero-offset. (Cycling Weekly was dropped: its hands-on test pair was the RK200 Look-Keo trim, not the RS200.) (2 sourced reviews, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Accurate, reliable power data that tracks closely with reference power meters (Stages, Quarq); Best-in-class cleat compatibility — one spindle swappable across road and off-road pedal bodies; Clean, normal-looking pedals carried over from the Vector 3.

Flagged: Premium price versus rivals like the Favero Assioma; Weak temperature compensation — needs a manual zero-offset after temperature shifts; Slightly delayed data pick-up when starting from a complete stop.

4iiii Precision 3+

No sourced tester review yet.

← All cycling power meters compared · Open data