Best Dash Cams · head-to-head

Nextbase 622GW vs Garmin Dash Cam 67W

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Garmin Dash Cam 67W is cheaper at $259.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Nextbase 622GW or Garmin Dash Cam 67W?

The Garmin Dash Cam 67W wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Garmin Dash Cam 67W is the cheaper at $259.99. The Garmin Dash Cam 67W both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Key specs, head to head

The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.

Storage max (GB)
Nextbase 622GW 128
Garmin Dash Cam 67W 512

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Nextbase 622GW Garmin Dash Cam 67W
US price $379.99 $259.99
BrandNextbaseGarmin
Released20202021
Resolution 4K UHD (3840x2160) 1440p (2560x1440)
Channels 1 1
FOV (°) 140 180
Gps Yes Yes
Parking mode Yes Yes
Storage max (GB) 128 512
Wi-Fi Yes Yes
Display 3-inch IPS touchscreen
Release 2020 2021

Sources — Nextbase 622GW: manua.ls (verified 2026-06-15). Garmin Dash Cam 67W: manua.ls (verified 2026-06-15).

What's the difference between the Nextbase 622GW and Garmin Dash Cam 67W?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (3 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Resolution: Nextbase 622GW 4K UHD (3840x2160) vs Garmin Dash Cam 67W 1440p (2560x1440)
  • FOV (°): Nextbase 622GW 140 vs Garmin Dash Cam 67W 180
  • Storage max (GB): Nextbase 622GW 128 vs Garmin Dash Cam 67W 512

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Nextbase 622GW

Two whitelisted hands-on reviews (Tom's Guide, TechRadar) both rate the Nextbase 622GW among the best dash cams: excellent, sharp 4K footage clear enough to read number plates, effective image stabilization, and strong low-light/poor-weather performance. Both flag a clunky companion app with unreliable Wi-Fi pairing and a steep price, plus a rear camera that is a separate purchase. Neither published independently measured numbers. (2 sourced reviews.)

Praised: Excellent, sharp 4K footage clear enough to read number plates; Effective image stabilization keeps footage smooth over bumps; Strong low-light and poor-weather recording performance.

Flagged: Companion app is clunky/frustrating, with unreliable Wi-Fi pairing; Expensive for a dash cam; Rear camera is a separate purchase (extra cost/wiring).

Garmin Dash Cam 67W

Only one whitelisted tester (TechRadar, hands-on) reviewed this exact model, so this is a single-source consensus. TechRadar recommends it: sharp 1440p HDR video, a matchbox-sized discreet body and easy magnetic setup, but flags that connected cloud features need a trusted Wi-Fi network (no SIM), parking mode needs constant power (hard-wiring), the tiny 2-inch screen and small side buttons are fiddly, and no microSD card is bundled. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Compact, matchbox-sized body that hides discreetly on the windscreen; Sharp 1440p HDR footage in both bright daylight and low light; Connected features: cloud Vault Storage backup and remote live view via the Garmin Drive app.

Flagged: Cloud/remote features need a trusted Wi-Fi network; no built-in SIM like some rivals; Parking mode requires constant power, so hard-wiring into the vehicle is needed; Tiny 2-inch rear screen and small side buttons are fiddly to use while driving.

← All dash cams compared · Open data