Best Drum Machines · head-to-head

TR-8S Rhythm Performer vs PO-32 tonic

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. PO-32 tonic is cheaper at $89. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the TR-8S Rhythm Performer or PO-32 tonic?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The PO-32 tonic is the cheaper at $89.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec TR-8S Rhythm Performer PO-32 tonic
US price $699 $89
BrandRolandTeenage Engineering
Released2018-112017-04
Sound engine Analog Circuit Behavior (ACB) modeling of the TR-808/909/707/606/727 and CR-78, plus an FM synthesis engine and sample playback Sonic Charge Microtonic-derived digital drum/percussion synthesis engine (co-developed with Sonic Charge)
Voice count 11 16 sound slots (unlimited additional sounds via Microtonic VST data transfer)
Sequencer steps 16 steps per variation, 8 (A-H) chainable variations per pattern (TR-REC) 16
Sample playback Yes No
Onboard effects 13 instrument FX types, 7 reverbs, 4 delays, 21 master FX, plus Scatter live-remix fills 16 real-time performance/parameter effects (beat manipulation and sound distortion)
Output count 8 individual analog outs + stereo master + headphone 1 (3.5mm audio I/O) + built-in speaker
Midi support Yes No
Battery powered No Yes
Pad count 16 16

Sources — TR-8S Rhythm Performer: roland.com (verified 2026-08-01). PO-32 tonic: teenage.engineering (verified 2026-08-01).

What's the difference between the TR-8S Rhythm Performer and PO-32 tonic?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (8 of 9). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Sound engine: TR-8S Rhythm Performer Analog Circuit Behavior (ACB) modeling of the TR-808/909/707/606/727 and CR-78, plus an FM synthesis engine and sample playback vs PO-32 tonic Sonic Charge Microtonic-derived digital drum/percussion synthesis engine (co-developed with Sonic Charge)
  • Voice count: TR-8S Rhythm Performer 11 vs PO-32 tonic 16 sound slots (unlimited additional sounds via Microtonic VST data transfer)
  • Sequencer steps: TR-8S Rhythm Performer 16 steps per variation, 8 (A-H) chainable variations per pattern (TR-REC) vs PO-32 tonic 16
  • Sample playback: TR-8S Rhythm Performer true vs PO-32 tonic false
  • Onboard effects: TR-8S Rhythm Performer 13 instrument FX types, 7 reverbs, 4 delays, 21 master FX, plus Scatter live-remix fills vs PO-32 tonic 16 real-time performance/parameter effects (beat manipulation and sound distortion)
  • Output count: TR-8S Rhythm Performer 8 individual analog outs + stereo master + headphone vs PO-32 tonic 1 (3.5mm audio I/O) + built-in speaker
  • Midi support: TR-8S Rhythm Performer true vs PO-32 tonic false
  • Battery powered: TR-8S Rhythm Performer false vs PO-32 tonic true

← All drum machines compared · Open data