Best Dust Collectors · head-to-head

RIKON 60-101 Wall-Mounted Dust Collector vs Oneida Dust Deputy 2.5 Deluxe Kit (5-Gallon)

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Oneida Dust Deputy 2.5 Deluxe Kit (5-Gallon) is cheaper at $139.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the RIKON 60-101 Wall-Mounted Dust Collector or Oneida Dust Deputy 2.5 Deluxe Kit (5-Gallon)?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Oneida Dust Deputy 2.5 Deluxe Kit (5-Gallon) is the cheaper at $139.99.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec RIKON 60-101 Wall-Mounted Dust Collector Oneida Dust Deputy 2.5 Deluxe Kit (5-Gallon)
US price $458.66 $139.99
BrandRIKON Power ToolsOneida Air Systems
Released2022
Airflow (CFM) 1100
Static pressure (in)
Filtration micron 1
Motor power hp 1
Collection capacity cu (ft) 1.5 0.67
Inlet diameter (in) 4 2.5
Noise (dB)
Filter type pleated canister none — cyclone pre-separator, no filter media (pairs with the buyer's own wet/dry vacuum)

Sources — RIKON 60-101 Wall-Mounted Dust Collector: rikontools.com (verified 2026-08-01). Oneida Dust Deputy 2.5 Deluxe Kit (5-Gallon): woodcraft.com (verified 2026-08-01).

What's the difference between the RIKON 60-101 Wall-Mounted Dust Collector and Oneida Dust Deputy 2.5 Deluxe Kit (5-Gallon)?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (3 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Collection capacity cu (ft): RIKON 60-101 Wall-Mounted Dust Collector 1.5 vs Oneida Dust Deputy 2.5 Deluxe Kit (5-Gallon) 0.67
  • Inlet diameter (in): RIKON 60-101 Wall-Mounted Dust Collector 4 vs Oneida Dust Deputy 2.5 Deluxe Kit (5-Gallon) 2.5
  • Filter type: RIKON 60-101 Wall-Mounted Dust Collector pleated canister vs Oneida Dust Deputy 2.5 Deluxe Kit (5-Gallon) none — cyclone pre-separator, no filter media (pairs with the buyer's own wet/dry vacuum)

← All dust collectors compared · Open data