Vitamix
FoodCycler Eco 3
$499Cheaper
Best Electric Composters · head-to-head
FoodCycler Eco 3 vs Tero Composter
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. FoodCycler Eco 3 is cheaper at $499. Every spec and price links to its source.
No photo yet
Tero
Tero Composter
$595
Released 2021-09
Which is better: the FoodCycler Eco 3 or Tero Composter?
On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The FoodCycler Eco 3 is the cheaper at $499.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | FoodCycler Eco 3 | Tero Composter |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $499 | $595 |
| Brand | Vitamix | Tero |
| Released | — | 2021-09 |
| Capacity liters | 3.5 | 4 |
| Cycle time hours | 4-9 | 6.5-7 (1 hr heat + ~5 hr grind + 0.5-1 hr cool) |
| Noise level (dB) | — | — |
| Power watts | — | — |
| Carbon filter | Yes | Yes |
| Bucket dishwasher safe | Yes | Yes |
| Weight (kg) | 12.9 | — |
| Volume reduction percent | 90 | 85 |
| Dimensions (in) | 11 x 9 x 13 (H x W x D) | 15.8 x 8.5 x 11 |
Sources — FoodCycler Eco 3: foodcycler.com (verified 2026-08-01). Tero Composter: dobbernationloves.com (verified 2026-08-01).
What's the difference between the FoodCycler Eco 3 and Tero Composter?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 9). Matching specs are omitted.
- Capacity liters: FoodCycler Eco 3 3.5 vs Tero Composter 4
- Cycle time hours: FoodCycler Eco 3 4-9 vs Tero Composter 6.5-7 (1 hr heat + ~5 hr grind + 0.5-1 hr cool)
- Volume reduction percent: FoodCycler Eco 3 90 vs Tero Composter 85
- Dimensions (in): FoodCycler Eco 3 11 x 9 x 13 (H x W x D) vs Tero Composter 15.8 x 8.5 x 11