Walker's Game Ear
Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff
$39.99Cheaper
Best Electronic Shooting Earmuffs · head-to-head
Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff vs Howard Leight by Honeywell Impact Sport Sound Amplification Electronic Shooting Earmuff
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff is cheaper at $39.99. Every spec and price links to its source.
Howard Leight (Honeywell)
Howard Leight by Honeywell Impact Sport Sound Amplification Electronic Shooting Earmuff
$59.95
Which is better: the Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff or Howard Leight by Honeywell Impact Sport Sound Amplification Electronic Shooting Earmuff?
On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff is the cheaper at $39.99.
See Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff on Amazon See Howard Leight by Honeywell Impact Sport Sound Amplification Electronic Shooting Earmuff on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff | Howard Leight by Honeywell Impact Sport Sound Amplification Electronic Shooting Earmuff |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $39.99 | $59.95 |
| Brand | Walker's Game Ear | Howard Leight (Honeywell) |
| Released | — | — |
| Noise reduction rating (d b) | 23 | 22 |
| Amplification cutoff time (ms) | 20 | — |
| Microphone type (directional/omni) | omni (two hi-gain omnidirectional mics) | directional |
| Bluetooth (yes/no) | No | No |
| Battery type & runtime | 2x AAA; ~40 hrs at high volume, ~80 hrs at low volume | 2x AAA; ~350 hrs; auto shut-off after 4 hrs |
| Cushion type | low-profile sound-dampening composite ear cups (gel-hybrid replacement pads sold separately) | foam ear cushions |
| Foldable design | Yes | Yes |
| Weight (oz) | — | 10.6 |
Sources — Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff: walkersgameear.com (verified 2026-08-11). Howard Leight by Honeywell Impact Sport Sound Amplification Electronic Shooting Earmuff: howardleightshootingsports.com (verified 2026-08-11).
What's the difference between the Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff and Howard Leight by Honeywell Impact Sport Sound Amplification Electronic Shooting Earmuff?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.
- Noise reduction rating (d b): Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff 23 vs Howard Leight by Honeywell Impact Sport Sound Amplification Electronic Shooting Earmuff 22
- Microphone type (directional/omni): Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff omni (two hi-gain omnidirectional mics) vs Howard Leight by Honeywell Impact Sport Sound Amplification Electronic Shooting Earmuff directional
- Battery type & runtime: Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff 2x AAA; ~40 hrs at high volume, ~80 hrs at low volume vs Howard Leight by Honeywell Impact Sport Sound Amplification Electronic Shooting Earmuff 2x AAA; ~350 hrs; auto shut-off after 4 hrs
- Cushion type: Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Earmuff low-profile sound-dampening composite ear cups (gel-hybrid replacement pads sold separately) vs Howard Leight by Honeywell Impact Sport Sound Amplification Electronic Shooting Earmuff foam ear cushions