Best Fitness Trackers · head-to-head

Garmin Vivosmart 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Ring

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Garmin Vivosmart 5 is cheaper at $149.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Garmin Vivosmart 5 or Samsung Galaxy Ring?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Garmin Vivosmart 5 is the cheaper at $149.99.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Garmin Vivosmart 5 Samsung Galaxy Ring
US price $149.99 US MSRP at launch Apr 20 2022. $399.99
BrandGarminSamsung
Released2022-042024-07
Form factor band ring
Display OLED 0.84in monochrome
Battery days 7 7
Gps No No
Spo2 Yes Yes
Ecg No No
Subscription required No No
Water resistance (m) 50 100
Release 2022 2024

Sources — Garmin Vivosmart 5: garmin.com (verified 2026-06-15). Samsung Galaxy Ring: androidcentral.com (verified 2026-06-15).

What's the difference between the Garmin Vivosmart 5 and Samsung Galaxy Ring?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (2 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Form factor: Garmin Vivosmart 5 band vs Samsung Galaxy Ring ring
  • Water resistance (m): Garmin Vivosmart 5 50 vs Samsung Galaxy Ring 100

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Garmin Vivosmart 5

Three whitelisted testers (DC Rainmaker, Tom's Guide, TechRadar) field-tested the exact Vivosmart 5. All praise its accurate optical heart rate, ~7-day battery (with all-day SpO2 off), and free no-subscription Garmin Connect data, but flag the dated monochrome screen and missing onboard GPS. DC Rainmaker calls it a rare miss and overpriced versus the $149 Fitbit Charge 5; TechRadar calls it excellent for everyday wellbeing; Tom's Guide rates it a good tracker that falls short without GPS. (3 sourced reviews, 3 lab-tested.)

Praised: Accurate, responsive optical heart rate in workout/interval tests; Long ~7-day battery life (with all-day SpO2 disabled); Deep Garmin Connect data with no subscription paywall (unlike Fitbit).

Flagged: No onboard GPS; relies on phone, causing distance errors on longer routes; Dated monochrome screen, hard to read outdoors/on the move; All-day SpO2 monitoring drains battery drastically (to ~3-4 days).

Samsung Galaxy Ring

Three whitelisted testers (Engadget, TechRadar, Tom's Guide) wore the first-gen Galaxy Ring for a week or more. All praise its light, comfortable design, ~5-7 day battery and no-subscription Samsung Health tracking. Common gripes: the $399 price, Samsung-phone/app lock-in, and thin feature set versus Oura. None ran lab-grade accuracy tests. (3 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)

Praised: Lightweight, comfortable, unobtrusive to sleep in; Strong real-world battery life (roughly 5-7 days); No subscription fee for Samsung Health features.

Flagged: High $399 price for limited functionality vs a watch; Requires Samsung/Android + Samsung Health; no iPhone support and gestures limited to some phones; Software/features lag Oura and AI advice can be off-base.

← All fitness trackers compared · Open data