Best Fitness Trackers · head-to-head

WHOOP 4.0 vs Samsung Galaxy Ring

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Samsung Galaxy Ring is cheaper at $399.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec WHOOP 4.0 Samsung Galaxy Ring
US price $399.99
BrandWHOOPSamsung
Released2021-102024-07
Form factor band ring
Display
Battery days 5 7
Gps No No
Spo2 Yes Yes
Ecg No No
Subscription required Yes No
Water resistance (m) 10 100
Release 2021 2024

Sources — WHOOP 4.0: dcrainmaker.com (verified 2026-06-15). Samsung Galaxy Ring: androidcentral.com (verified 2026-06-15).

What's the difference between the WHOOP 4.0 and Samsung Galaxy Ring?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Form factor: WHOOP 4.0 band vs Samsung Galaxy Ring ring
  • Battery days: WHOOP 4.0 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Ring 7
  • Subscription required: WHOOP 4.0 true vs Samsung Galaxy Ring false
  • Water resistance (m): WHOOP 4.0 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Ring 100

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

WHOOP 4.0

No sourced tester review yet.

Samsung Galaxy Ring

Three whitelisted testers (Engadget, TechRadar, Tom's Guide) wore the first-gen Galaxy Ring for a week or more. All praise its light, comfortable design, ~5-7 day battery and no-subscription Samsung Health tracking. Common gripes: the $399 price, Samsung-phone/app lock-in, and thin feature set versus Oura. None ran lab-grade accuracy tests. (3 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)

Praised: Lightweight, comfortable, unobtrusive to sleep in; Strong real-world battery life (roughly 5-7 days); No subscription fee for Samsung Health features.

Flagged: High $399 price for limited functionality vs a watch; Requires Samsung/Android + Samsung Health; no iPhone support and gestures limited to some phones; Software/features lag Oura and AI advice can be off-base.

← All fitness trackers compared · Open data