Best Floorstanding Speakers · head-to-head

Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 vs Polk Reserve R700

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Polk Reserve R700 is cheaper at $1199. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 or Polk Reserve R700?

The Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 Polk Reserve R700
US price $1199
BrandBowers & WilkinsPolk Audio
Released
Way configuration 3-way 3-way
Woofer size (in) 3 x 6.5 2 x 8
Tweeter type
Frequency response (Hz) 46-28000 38-38000
Sensitivity (dB) 90 88
Nominal impedance ohms 8
Crossover frequency (Hz) 350/2700
Recommended power watts 30-300 50-300
Enclosure type bass-reflex bass-reflex
Height (in) 39.8 45
Weight (lb) 73.8 79.1

Sources — Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3: bowerswilkins.com (verified 2026-07-11). Polk Reserve R700: polkaudio.com (verified 2026-07-11).

What's the difference between the Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 and Polk Reserve R700?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (6 of 11). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Woofer size (in): Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 3 x 6.5 vs Polk Reserve R700 2 x 8
  • Frequency response (Hz): Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 46-28000 vs Polk Reserve R700 38-38000
  • Sensitivity (dB): Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 90 vs Polk Reserve R700 88
  • Recommended power watts: Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 30-300 vs Polk Reserve R700 50-300
  • Height (in): Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 39.8 vs Polk Reserve R700 45
  • Weight (lb): Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 73.8 vs Polk Reserve R700 79.1

← All floorstanding speakers compared · Open data