Best Floorstanding Speakers · head-to-head

KEF R11 Meta vs Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. KEF R11 Meta is cheaper at $3499.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the KEF R11 Meta or Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3?

The Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec KEF R11 Meta Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3
US price $3499.99
BrandKEFBowers & Wilkins
Released
Way configuration 3-way 3-way
Woofer size (in) 4 x 6.5 3 x 6.5
Tweeter type aluminium-dome
Frequency response (Hz) 46-28000 46-28000
Sensitivity (dB) 90 90
Nominal impedance ohms 4 8
Crossover frequency (Hz) 330, 2500
Recommended power watts 15-300 30-300
Enclosure type bass-reflex bass-reflex
Height (in) 49.2 39.8
Weight (lb) 80.5 73.8

Sources — KEF R11 Meta: us.kef.com (verified 2026-07-11). Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3: bowerswilkins.com (verified 2026-07-11).

What's the difference between the KEF R11 Meta and Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 11). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Woofer size (in): KEF R11 Meta 4 x 6.5 vs Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 3 x 6.5
  • Nominal impedance ohms: KEF R11 Meta 4 vs Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 8
  • Recommended power watts: KEF R11 Meta 15-300 vs Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 30-300
  • Height (in): KEF R11 Meta 49.2 vs Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 39.8
  • Weight (lb): KEF R11 Meta 80.5 vs Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 73.8

← All floorstanding speakers compared · Open data