Best Grow Lights · head-to-head

Mars Hydro FC-E6500 vs Gavita Pro 1700e LED

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Mars Hydro FC-E6500 is cheaper at $489.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Mars Hydro FC-E6500 or Gavita Pro 1700e LED?

The Mars Hydro FC-E6500 wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Mars Hydro FC-E6500 is the cheaper at $489.99. The Mars Hydro FC-E6500 both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Mars Hydro FC-E6500 Gavita Pro 1700e LED
US price $489.99 $1399
BrandMars HydroGavita
Released
Actual power (W) 730 645
Ppf umol s 2026 1700
Efficacy umol j 2.8 2.6
Flower footprint (ft) 4x4
Spectrum type white-plus-red white-plus-red
Diode count 3546 3336
Dimmable Yes Yes
Input voltage range 120-277 120-277
Form factor bar-array bar-array
IP rating IP65 IP66
Warranty years 5 3
Weight (kg) 10.72 12.9

Sources — Mars Hydro FC-E6500: wholesale.mars-hydro.com (verified 2026-07-11). Gavita Pro 1700e LED: advancedhydrogardens.com (verified 2026-07-11).

What's the difference between the Mars Hydro FC-E6500 and Gavita Pro 1700e LED?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (7 of 12). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Actual power (W): Mars Hydro FC-E6500 730 vs Gavita Pro 1700e LED 645
  • Ppf umol s: Mars Hydro FC-E6500 2026 vs Gavita Pro 1700e LED 1700
  • Efficacy umol j: Mars Hydro FC-E6500 2.8 vs Gavita Pro 1700e LED 2.6
  • Diode count: Mars Hydro FC-E6500 3546 vs Gavita Pro 1700e LED 3336
  • IP rating: Mars Hydro FC-E6500 IP65 vs Gavita Pro 1700e LED IP66
  • Warranty years: Mars Hydro FC-E6500 5 vs Gavita Pro 1700e LED 3
  • Weight (kg): Mars Hydro FC-E6500 10.72 vs Gavita Pro 1700e LED 12.9

← All grow lights compared · Open data