MuellerLiving
MuellerLiving Ultra-Stick Immersion Hand Blender (500 W)
$39.99Cheaper
Best Immersion Blenders · head-to-head
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. MuellerLiving Ultra-Stick Immersion Hand Blender (500 W) is cheaper at $39.99. Every spec and price links to its source.
MuellerLiving
$39.99Cheaper
Cuisinart
$89.95
On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The MuellerLiving Ultra-Stick Immersion Hand Blender (500 W) is the cheaper at $39.99.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | | |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $39.99 | $89.95 |
| Brand | MuellerLiving | Cuisinart |
| Released | — | — |
| Power watts | 500 | 300 |
| Speed settings | 9 | variable (slide control with pulse) |
| Cordless | No | No |
| Attachments included | stainless steel blending shaft, whisk, milk frother, measuring beaker | blending shaft, 3-cup chopper/grinder, chef's whisk, 2-cup mixing/measuring cup |
| Blade material | stainless steel (304 brushed) | stainless steel (8-inch shaft) |
| Detachable shaft | Yes | Yes |
| Dishwasher safe parts | Yes | Yes |
| Release year | — | — |
Sources — MuellerLiving Ultra-Stick Immersion Hand Blender (500 W): muellerliving.com (verified 2026-06-19). Cuisinart Smart Stick Variable Speed Hand Blender (CSB-179P1): cuisinart.com (verified 2026-06-19).
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
One whitelisted hands-on source survived verification: Reviewed (USA Today), which tested the Mueller Ultra-Stick over a week of whipped-cream, soup, and pesto trials and ranked it poorly. The blending attachment twisted off mid-whip and stopped the motor, the missing food-processor/chopper attachment made pesto challenging, and the blending head 'could barely handle shredding the basil'—leaving it, in Reviewed's words, 'a poorly-constructed product that isn't up to most blending tasks,' redeemed only by its light-up buttons and interesting design. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Light-up buttons and interesting design; Comes with whisk, frother, and blending attachments.
Flagged: Blending attachment twisted off and stopped the motor during the whipped-cream test; No food processor/chopper attachment, and the blending head barely shredded basil for pesto; Feels poorly constructed and not up to most blending tasks.
Only one whitelisted hands-on test of this exact model survived verification: Good Housekeeping (accessed via AOL syndication). It fully pureed a thick vegetable soup in 90 seconds and its processor chopped garlic evenly, but it crushed frozen fruit for smoothies about 30 seconds slower than GH's top picks and struggled with parsley and hummus. GH lists it under 'other immersion blenders we recommend' rather than as a category winner. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Fully pureed a thick vegetable soup in 90 seconds; Processor chopped garlic evenly.
Flagged: Crushed frozen fruit for smoothies about 30 seconds slower than top picks; Struggled to chop parsley and did not puree hummus effectively.