Best In Ear Monitors · head-to-head

Meze Alba vs Etymotic ER4XR

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Meze Alba is cheaper at $159. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Meze Alba or Etymotic ER4XR?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Meze Alba is the cheaper at $159.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Meze Alba Etymotic ER4XR
US price $159 $349
BrandMeze AudioEtymotic
Released2016
Driver type dynamic balanced-armature
Driver config 1DD 1BA
Impedance ohms 32 45
Sensitivity db mw 109 98
Frequency response (Hz) 15-25000 20-16000
Connector type 2pin-0.78mm mmcx
Cable detachable Yes Yes
Plug termination 3.5mm 3.5mm
Shell material zinc-alloy aluminum
Weight grams

Sources — Meze Alba: mezeaudio.com (verified 2026-07-11). Etymotic ER4XR: etymotic.com (verified 2026-07-11).

What's the difference between the Meze Alba and Etymotic ER4XR?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (7 of 10). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Driver type: Meze Alba dynamic vs Etymotic ER4XR balanced-armature
  • Driver config: Meze Alba 1DD vs Etymotic ER4XR 1BA
  • Impedance ohms: Meze Alba 32 vs Etymotic ER4XR 45
  • Sensitivity db mw: Meze Alba 109 vs Etymotic ER4XR 98
  • Frequency response (Hz): Meze Alba 15-25000 vs Etymotic ER4XR 20-16000
  • Connector type: Meze Alba 2pin-0.78mm vs Etymotic ER4XR mmcx
  • Shell material: Meze Alba zinc-alloy vs Etymotic ER4XR aluminum

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Meze Alba

Both whitelisted hands-on reviews — SoundGuys (Apr 2025) and TechRadar (Sep 2025) — recommend the $159 Meze Alba as an excellent entry-level audiophile IEM with detailed sound, weighty bass, a comfortable fit and a bundled USB-C DAC adapter; both flag edgy/painful upper treble at high volume and the lack of a mic or in-line controls. Only SoundGuys ran lab MDAQS measurements (Overall 4.8/5, HEAD acoustics). All quotes and measured values were verified as literal substrings of the source text; no sources were dropped. (2 sourced reviews, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Detailed, clear sound across the frequency range; Weighty, punchy bass for such a small IEM; Premium-feeling build and looks (zinc alloy/anodized aluminium) at a low $159 price.

Flagged: Upper treble gets edgy/painful at higher volumes; No microphone or in-line/volume controls; Cable issues (tangling / poor over-ear fit).

Etymotic ER4XR

Three whitelisted testers (What Hi-Fi, TechHive, TechRadar) reviewed the ER4XR; TechRadar's is a joint ER4SR/ER4XR piece that discusses the XR trim explicitly. All three praise reference-grade midrange clarity, and two single out a tasteful bass lift over the ER4SR, but none ran lab measurements. Fit divides them: two call the deep insertion invasive or strange, one finds the flanges very comfortable. (3 sourced reviews.)

Praised: Reference-grade, near-perfect tuning with excellent midrange detail and clarity; Tasteful bass lift over the ER4SR without bloat or losing accuracy; Class-leading passive noise isolation from the sealed, non-ported design.

Flagged: No in-line mic or remote; wired-only connection; Deep-insertion, triple-flange fit feels invasive or strange for some; Analytical, sibilant sound that punishes low-quality sources.

← All in ear monitors compared · Open data