No photo yet
Braun
Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137
$399.99
Released 2019
Best IPL Hair Removal · head-to-head
Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137 vs Kenzzi IPL Pro+
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Kenzzi IPL Pro+ is cheaper at $249. Every spec and price links to its source.
Kenzzi
Kenzzi IPL Pro+
$249Cheaper
Which is better: the Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137 or Kenzzi IPL Pro+?
On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Kenzzi IPL Pro+ is the cheaper at $249.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137 | Kenzzi IPL Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $399.99 | $249 |
| Brand | Braun | Kenzzi |
| Released | 2019 | — |
| Intensity levels | 10 | 5 |
| Flash window cm2 | 3 | 4.2 |
| Lamp lifespan flashes | 400000 | 1000000 |
| Skin tone sensor | Yes | Yes |
| Power | corded | cordless |
| Modes | glide, stamp | glide, stamp |
| Body and face | Yes | Yes |
| Release | 2019 | — |
Sources — Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137: us.braun.com (verified 2026-06-19). Kenzzi IPL Pro+: kenzzi.com (verified 2026-06-19).
What's the difference between the Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137 and Kenzzi IPL Pro+?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
- Intensity levels: Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137 10 vs Kenzzi IPL Pro+ 5
- Flash window cm2: Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137 3 vs Kenzzi IPL Pro+ 4.2
- Lamp lifespan flashes: Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137 400000 vs Kenzzi IPL Pro+ 1000000
- Power: Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137 corded vs Kenzzi IPL Pro+ cordless
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137
Two whitelisted outlets (TechRadar, Tom's Guide) give genuine hands-on personal accounts of the Braun Silk-Expert Pro 5, both rating it highly for fast, comfortable at-home hair reduction after a handful of sessions. Neither ran lab benchmarks, so no measured values exist. Only the TechRadar writer (a five-year user) raises caveats: results fade without ongoing top-ups, IPL suits dark hair on pale skin only, and effectiveness varies by body area. Tom's Guide's account is uniformly positive. (2 sourced reviews.)
Praised: Effective, long-lasting hair reduction after a handful of sessions; Fast, comfortable, essentially painless sessions; Auto skin-tone-adjusting flashes make it easy and low-effort to use.
Flagged: Not permanent — requires ongoing maintenance top-up sessions; Only works well on dark hair / pale skin; poor for fair hair or darker skin tones; Effectiveness varies by body area (weaker on legs for one tester).
Kenzzi IPL Pro+
No sourced tester review yet.