No photo yet
Braun
Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137
$399.99
Released 2019
Best IPL Hair Removal · head-to-head
Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137 vs Nood The Flasher 2.0
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Nood The Flasher 2.0 is cheaper at $199. Every spec and price links to its source.
Nood
Nood The Flasher 2.0
$199Cheaper
Released 2022
Which is better: the Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137 or Nood The Flasher 2.0?
On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Nood The Flasher 2.0 is the cheaper at $199.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137 | Nood The Flasher 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $399.99 | $199 |
| Brand | Braun | Nood |
| Released | 2019 | 2022 |
| Intensity levels | 10 | 7 |
| Flash window cm2 | 3 | — |
| Lamp lifespan flashes | 400000 | — |
| Skin tone sensor | Yes | No |
| Power | corded | corded |
| Modes | glide, stamp | glide, stamp |
| Body and face | Yes | Yes |
| Release | 2019 | 2022 |
Sources — Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137: us.braun.com (verified 2026-06-19). Nood The Flasher 2.0: trynood.com (verified 2026-06-19).
What's the difference between the Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137 and Nood The Flasher 2.0?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (2 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
- Intensity levels: Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137 10 vs Nood The Flasher 2.0 7
- Skin tone sensor: Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137 true vs Nood The Flasher 2.0 false
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 PL5137
Two whitelisted outlets (TechRadar, Tom's Guide) give genuine hands-on personal accounts of the Braun Silk-Expert Pro 5, both rating it highly for fast, comfortable at-home hair reduction after a handful of sessions. Neither ran lab benchmarks, so no measured values exist. Only the TechRadar writer (a five-year user) raises caveats: results fade without ongoing top-ups, IPL suits dark hair on pale skin only, and effectiveness varies by body area. Tom's Guide's account is uniformly positive. (2 sourced reviews.)
Praised: Effective, long-lasting hair reduction after a handful of sessions; Fast, comfortable, essentially painless sessions; Auto skin-tone-adjusting flashes make it easy and low-effort to use.
Flagged: Not permanent — requires ongoing maintenance top-up sessions; Only works well on dark hair / pale skin; poor for fair hair or darker skin tones; Effectiveness varies by body area (weaker on legs for one tester).
Nood The Flasher 2.0
Only one whitelisted tester, Good Housekeeping's Beauty Lab, hands-on evaluated the Nood The Flasher 2.0, naming it Best Value. Testers found the instructions and device easy to use and praised its light, compact build, but flagged the missing precision head. No lab-measured numbers were reported; Forbes, Consumer Reports and Today were excluded as non-whitelisted. (1 sourced review.)
Praised: Lightweight, compact and easy to use; Best-value pick; 90-day full refund and free device replacement when flashes run out; On-off button that some IPL devices lack.
Flagged: No precision head attachment, so flash light can escape from the sides on small, bony areas; Shorter cord length.