Hurom
H-AA Slow Juicer
$399Cheaper
Released 2016
Best Juicers · head-to-head
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. H-AA Slow Juicer is cheaper at $399. Every spec and price links to its source.
Hurom
$399Cheaper
Released 2016
Nama
$599
The J2 Cold Press Juicer wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The H-AA Slow Juicer is the cheaper at $399. Get the J2 Cold Press Juicer for the stronger spec sheet, the H-AA Slow Juicer to spend less.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | | |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $399 MSRP per hurom.com | $599 MSRP per namawell.com |
| Brand | Hurom | Nama |
| Released | 2016 | — |
| Type | masticating | masticating |
| Motor watts | 150 | 200 |
| RPM | 43 | 50 |
| Feed chute (in) | 2 in | — |
| Dishwasher safe parts | No | — |
| Warranty years | 10 | 15 |
| Weight (lb) | 18.2 | 12.1 |
| Release | 2016 | — |
Sources — H-AA Slow Juicer: hurom.com (verified 2026-06-19). J2 Cold Press Juicer: namawell.com (verified 2026-06-19).
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Two whitelisted hands-on testers (Real Homes, Tom's Guide) rate the Hurom H-AA a top-tier slow juicer with class-leading juice yields and a stylish, compact build, while both flag the steep ~$439 price. Real Homes additionally criticized hand-only cleaning, a small feed chute requiring lots of pre-chopping, and a poorly translated manual. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Class-leading juice yields / thorough extraction with dry pulp; Stylish, compact upright design that looks good on the counter; Versatile beyond juice — makes sorbet, ice cream and nut milk.
Flagged: Very high price (~$439) hard to justify vs cheaper juicers; Hand-wash only / fiddly cleaning, no dishwasher-safe parts; Small feed chute means lots of pre-chopping prep.
Only one whitelisted tester (TechRadar) published a genuine hands-on review of this exact model. Reviewer Victoria Woollaston used it three times a week for two months and called it one of the best juicers she has tested, praising high yield, fresh flavor, and minimal prep, while flagging fiddly assembly, bulky size, and the $550 price. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Turns whole fruit and veg into fresh juice with minimal prep and effort; Tasty, clean-tasting juice with minimal foam thanks to the slow auger; Quiet operation and dry, easy-to-dispose pulp.
Flagged: Fiddly, non-obvious assembly and setup; Large, tall footprint that is hard to store and won't fit under cupboards; Expensive at $550, and low spout means you must use the supplied jug.