Best Microscopes · head-to-head

Swift SW380T vs Levenhuk D740T

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Swift SW380T is cheaper at —. Every spec and price links to its source.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Swift SW380T Levenhuk D740T
US price
BrandSwift OpticalLevenhuk
Released
Max magnification 2500 2000
Head type Trinocular, Siedentopf, 360-degree rotation, 30-degree ergonomic tilt Trinocular, 360-degree rotation, 45-degree inclination
Illumination type LED, built-in LED, 3W, brightness-adjustable
Objective count 4 4
Mechanical stage Yes Yes
Condenser type Abbe, coarse and fine adjustment Abbe, N.A. 1.25, iris diaphragm
Camera compatible Yes Yes
Focus mechanism Dual coarse and ultra-fine focus controls Coaxial; coarse 22mm stroke, fine 0.002mm per division

Sources — Swift SW380T: microscopecrew.com (verified 2026-08-01). Levenhuk D740T: levenhuk.com (verified 2026-08-01).

What's the difference between the Swift SW380T and Levenhuk D740T?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Max magnification: Swift SW380T 2500 vs Levenhuk D740T 2000
  • Head type: Swift SW380T Trinocular, Siedentopf, 360-degree rotation, 30-degree ergonomic tilt vs Levenhuk D740T Trinocular, 360-degree rotation, 45-degree inclination
  • Illumination type: Swift SW380T LED, built-in vs Levenhuk D740T LED, 3W, brightness-adjustable
  • Condenser type: Swift SW380T Abbe, coarse and fine adjustment vs Levenhuk D740T Abbe, N.A. 1.25, iris diaphragm
  • Focus mechanism: Swift SW380T Dual coarse and ultra-fine focus controls vs Levenhuk D740T Coaxial; coarse 22mm stroke, fine 0.002mm per division

← All microscopes compared · Open data