No photo yet
Swift Optical
Swift SW380T
—
Best Microscopes · head-to-head
Swift SW380T vs OMAX M837ZL
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Swift SW380T is cheaper at —. Every spec and price links to its source.
No photo yet
OMAX
OMAX M837ZL
—
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Swift SW380T | OMAX M837ZL |
|---|---|---|
| US price | — | — |
| Brand | Swift Optical | OMAX |
| Released | — | — |
| Max magnification | 2500 | 2500 |
| Head type | Trinocular, Siedentopf, 360-degree rotation, 30-degree ergonomic tilt | Trinocular, LED compound |
| Illumination type | LED, built-in | LED, adjustable brightness |
| Objective count | 4 | 4 |
| Mechanical stage | Yes | Yes |
| Condenser type | Abbe, coarse and fine adjustment | Abbe, N.A. 1.25, iris diaphragm |
| Camera compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Focus mechanism | Dual coarse and ultra-fine focus controls | — |
Sources — Swift SW380T: microscopecrew.com (verified 2026-08-01). OMAX M837ZL: omaxmicroscope.com (verified 2026-08-01).
What's the difference between the Swift SW380T and OMAX M837ZL?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (3 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.
- Head type: Swift SW380T Trinocular, Siedentopf, 360-degree rotation, 30-degree ergonomic tilt vs OMAX M837ZL Trinocular, LED compound
- Illumination type: Swift SW380T LED, built-in vs OMAX M837ZL LED, adjustable brightness
- Condenser type: Swift SW380T Abbe, coarse and fine adjustment vs OMAX M837ZL Abbe, N.A. 1.25, iris diaphragm